Negus S S, Vanderah T W, Brandt M R, Bilsky E J, Becerra L, Borsook D
Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 115 Mill St., Belmont, MA 02478-9106, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006 Nov;319(2):507-14. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.106377. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
In analgesic drug development, preclinical procedures are widely used to assess drug effects on pain-related behaviors. These procedures share two principal components: 1) a manipulation intended to produce a pain-like state in the experimental subject and 2) measurement of behaviors presumably indicative of that pain state. Drugs can then be evaluated for their ability to attenuate pain-related behaviors. In the simplest procedures, the pain state is produced by delivery of an acute noxious stimulus (e.g., a warm thermal stimulus), and the primary dependent measures focus on withdrawal responses or other nocifensive behaviors that increase in rate, frequency, or intensity in response to the noxious stimulus. This approach has been refined in two ways. First, new methods have been developed to induce more clinically relevant pain states. In particular, pain requiring clinical intervention is often associated with inflammation or neuropathy, and novel procedures have emerged to model these conditions and their ability to produce hypersensitive pain states, such as allodynia and hyperalgesia. Second, studies are incorporating a broader array of pain-related behaviors as dependent measures. For example, pain not only stimulates nocifensive behaviors but also suppresses many adaptive behaviors, such as feeding or locomotion. Measures of pain-suppressed behaviors can provide new insights into the behavioral consequences of pain and the effects of candidate analgesics. In addition, functional magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as a noninvasive tool for investigating changes in neural activity associated with pain and analgesia. Integration of these complementary approaches may improve the predictive validity of analgesic drug development.
在镇痛药研发中,临床前程序被广泛用于评估药物对疼痛相关行为的影响。这些程序有两个主要组成部分:1)旨在使实验对象产生类似疼痛状态的操作,以及2)对可能指示该疼痛状态的行为进行测量。然后可以评估药物减轻疼痛相关行为的能力。在最简单的程序中,通过施加急性有害刺激(例如温热刺激)来产生疼痛状态,主要的相关测量集中在对有害刺激做出反应时速率、频率或强度增加的退缩反应或其他防御性疼痛行为上。这种方法在两个方面得到了改进。首先,已经开发出新的方法来诱导更具临床相关性的疼痛状态。特别是,需要临床干预的疼痛通常与炎症或神经病变有关,并且已经出现了新的程序来模拟这些情况及其产生痛觉过敏和痛觉超敏等疼痛状态的能力。其次,研究正在纳入更广泛的与疼痛相关的行为作为相关测量。例如,疼痛不仅会刺激防御性疼痛行为,还会抑制许多适应性行为,如进食或运动。对疼痛抑制行为的测量可以为疼痛的行为后果和候选镇痛药的效果提供新的见解。此外,功能磁共振成像已成为一种用于研究与疼痛和镇痛相关的神经活动变化的非侵入性工具。整合这些互补方法可能会提高镇痛药研发的预测效度。