Dealler S F, Gough K R, Campbell L, Turner A, Hawkey P M
Department of Microbiology, University of Leeds.
J Clin Pathol. 1991 May;44(5):376-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.5.376.
A rapid enzyme activity strip test (Neisstrip, Lab M Ltd, Bury) was compared retrospectively with Phadebact Monoclonal GC coagglutination (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden), cystine trypticase agar sugar utilisation (CTA), and Gonochek II (J W Turner, Liverpool) enzyme methods for identification of 95 Neisseria spp and related species. These had been previously identified using standard methods and included 29 that had given aberrant results. Neisstrip identified correctly all but two, including nine incorrectly identified by Phadebact and 18 erroneously identified using CTA sugars. Results were similar to those obtained with Gonochek II. After this a prospective study was performed testing 400 oxidase positive isolates derived from clinical samples cultured on gonococcal selective medium. Two organisms, both Moraxella spp, were incorrectly identified as N gonorrhoeae by the Neisstrip. The superoxol test, when used with either the Phadebact or Neisstrip tests, maintained 100% sensitivity and specificity. The Neisstrip is a rapid, economic test that is accurate and easy to interpret. It may be used alone or in conjunction with a superoxol test or a coagglutination test, which is relatively accurate but more expensive, and found by some technical staff to be more difficult to interpret.
将一种快速酶活性试纸条检测法(Neisstrip,Lab M有限公司,伯里)与Phadebact单克隆GC凝集试验(法玛西亚诊断公司,瑞典乌普萨拉)、胱氨酸胰蛋白酶琼脂糖利用试验(CTA)以及Gonochek II(J W特纳公司,利物浦)酶法进行回顾性比较,以鉴定95株奈瑟菌属及相关菌种。这些菌株先前已用标准方法鉴定,其中包括29株结果异常的菌株。Neisstrip除两株外全部正确鉴定,这两株包括9株被Phadebact错误鉴定的和18株用CTA糖类错误鉴定的。结果与Gonochek II的结果相似。此后进行了一项前瞻性研究,检测了400株从淋球菌选择性培养基上培养的临床样本中分离出的氧化酶阳性菌株。有两株菌,均为莫拉菌属,被Neisstrip错误鉴定为淋病奈瑟菌。当与Phadebact或Neisstrip试验一起使用时,超氧化物试验保持了100%的敏感性和特异性。Neisstrip是一种快速、经济的检测方法,准确且易于解读。它可以单独使用,也可以与超氧化物试验或凝集试验联合使用,凝集试验相对准确但更昂贵,并且一些技术人员发现其更难解读。