Magnussen Svein, Andersson Jan, Cornoldi Cesare, De Beni Rossana, Endestad Tor, Goodman Gail S, Helstrup Tore, Koriat Asher, Larsson Maria, Melinder Annika, Nilsson Lars-Göran, Rönnberg Jerker, Zimmer Hubert
Centre for Advanced Study at the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo, Norway.
Memory. 2006 Jul;14(5):595-613. doi: 10.1080/09658210600646716.
Two representative samples of adult Norwegians (n=2000) were asked a set of general and specific questions regarding their beliefs and opinions about human memory. The results indicate that on many questions, such as time of the earliest memories, inhibiting effects of collaboration, and memory for dramatic versus ordinary events, the views of the general public concurred with current research findings, and people in general had realistic views about their own memory performance. On other questions, such as the reliability of olfactory as compared with visual and auditory memory, the memory of small children in comparison with that of adults, the likelihood of repression of adult traumatic memories, and on more general questions such as the possibility of training memory and the capacity limitations of long-term memory, a large proportion of the participants expressed views that are less supported by scientific evidence. Implications of these findings are briefly discussed.
研究人员向两组具有代表性的成年挪威人样本(n = 2000)询问了一系列关于他们对人类记忆的信念和看法的一般及特定问题。结果表明,在许多问题上,比如最早记忆的时间、合作的抑制作用以及戏剧性事件与普通事件的记忆等,公众的观点与当前的研究结果一致,而且人们总体上对自己的记忆表现持有现实的看法。在其他问题上,比如嗅觉记忆与视觉和听觉记忆的可靠性比较、幼儿记忆与成人记忆的比较、成人创伤性记忆被压抑的可能性,以及在更一般的问题上,比如记忆训练的可能性和长期记忆的容量限制等,很大一部分参与者表达的观点较少得到科学证据的支持。本文简要讨论了这些发现的意义。