Khan Ahsan Y, Carrithers Joe, Preskorn Sheldon H, Lear Rex, Wisniewski Stephen R, John Rush A, Stegman Diane, Kelley Colleen, Kreiner Karen, Nierenberg Andrew A, Fava Maurizio
University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Psychiatry, Wichita, KS, USA.
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Apr-Jun;18(2):91-8. doi: 10.1080/10401230600614496.
The purpose of this paper is to use demographic and clinical data from a large diverse group of outpatients diagnosed with non-psychotic major depression to investigate the validity of the DSM-IV concept of melancholic depression.
Baseline clinical and demographic data were collected on 1500 outpatients (1456 of whom melancholia could be determined) with non-psychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) participating in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study. Depressive symptom severity was assessed by clinical telephone interview using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D17) and the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C30). The types and degrees of concurrent psychiatric symptoms were measured using a self report, the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ), by recording the number of items relevant to each diagnostic category endorsed by study participants.
Adjusting for severity of depression (as measured by the total HRS-D17 scores), no differences were found in the rate of melancholic depression by race, marital status, education, employment status, family history of depression, primary care versus specialty care, monthly income, and degree of psychiatric and medical co-morbidity. Melancholic depression was significantly more likely in men than women. Melancholic depression after adjustment for severity was associated with a slightly younger age at study entry, as well as with greater illness severity, and slightly shorter duration of current episode. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower melancholic depression rates at the .06 level of significance.
Among outpatients with MDD, melancholic features were less likely in Hispanic patients, but more likely in slightly younger patients and in men. Melancholic features were also related to a slightly shorter current episode. These findings are consistent with the notion that external socio-demographic factors do not play an important role in the pathophysiology of melancholic depression.
本文旨在利用来自大量诊断为非精神病性重度抑郁症的门诊患者的人口统计学和临床数据,研究《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中抑郁性抑郁症概念的有效性。
收集了1500名参与缓解抑郁症序列治疗替代方案(STAR*D)研究的非精神病性重度抑郁症(MDD)门诊患者的基线临床和人口统计学数据(其中1456名患者可确定是否为抑郁性抑郁症)。通过使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRS-D17)和30项抑郁症状量表(IDS-C30)进行临床电话访谈来评估抑郁症状的严重程度。使用自我报告《精神疾病诊断筛查问卷》(PDSQ),通过记录研究参与者认可的与每个诊断类别相关的项目数量,来测量并发精神症状的类型和程度。
在调整抑郁症严重程度(以HRS-D17总分衡量)后,发现抑郁性抑郁症的发生率在种族、婚姻状况、教育程度、就业状况、抑郁症家族史、初级保健与专科护理、月收入以及精神和躯体共病程度方面没有差异。男性患抑郁性抑郁症的可能性显著高于女性。在调整严重程度后,抑郁性抑郁症与研究入组时年龄稍小、疾病严重程度更高以及当前发作持续时间稍短有关。西班牙裔种族在0.06的显著性水平上与较低的抑郁性抑郁症发生率相关。
在患有MDD的门诊患者中,西班牙裔患者出现抑郁性特征的可能性较小,但在年龄稍小的患者和男性中更常见。抑郁性特征也与当前发作持续时间稍短有关。这些发现与外部社会人口统计学因素在抑郁性抑郁症的病理生理学中不发挥重要作用的观点一致。