Suppr超能文献

忧郁症是一种独特的综合征吗?在伦德比研究的50年随访中,复发、慢性病程和严重程度提供了证据。

Is melancholia a distinct syndrome? Recurrence, chronicity, and severity give evidence in the 50 year follow-up of the Lundby Study.

作者信息

Nöbbelin Linnéa, Bogren Mats, Mattisson Cecilia, Westling Sofie, Brådvik Louise

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

The Lundby Study, Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 4;14:1216431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1216431. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Whether melancholia is a distinct syndrome has long been debated. One aspect of a valid syndrome is whether it allows for determination of a prognosis. The aim of this study is to investigate the course of melancholic depression versus non-melancholic depression with a focus on: (i) time to and probability of recovery from the first depressive episode, (ii) time to and risk of the first recurrence, (iii) rate of recurrence, (iv) time with depression or antidepressant medication, and (v) suicide risk.

METHODS

The Lundby Study is a longitudinal community study on mental health that followed a geographically defined population ( = 3,563) for up to 50 years, 1947-1997. Subjects with first onset depression were assessed as melancholic ( = 46) or non-melancholic ( = 381) using the DSM-IV melancholic specifier. These diagnoses were made in retrospect using all available information from semi-structured interviews by psychiatrists, key informants, registers, and patient records.

RESULTS

We found no significant difference between melancholic- and non-melancholic depression in time to and probability of recovery from the first depressive episode. The time to first recurrence was shorter in melancholic than in non-melancholic depression and the risk of first recurrence for the melancholic group was 2.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-4.20) times the risk in the non-melancholic group. The median rate of recurrence was higher in the melancholic group, at 0.19 recurrences per year at risk (interquartile range [IQR] 0.08-0.47), compared to the non-melancholic group, at 0.10 recurrences per year at risk (IQR 0.05-0.21) ( < 0.03). The median percentage of time being depressed or on antidepressant medication was higher in the melancholic group, 17% (IQR 3-20%), compared to the non-melancholic group, 8% (IQR 7-33%) ( < 0.001). The risk of suicide was higher in the melancholic group, hazard ratio 4.13 (95% CI 1.49-11.48,  < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

To conclude, melancholic depression had a more recurrent, chronic, and severe course with a higher suicide risk than did non-melancholic depression in the Lundby population. Although our use of retrospective diagnosis might limit interpretation of results, the findings indicate that melancholia may be useful in determining prognosis and may be a valid psychopathological syndrome.

摘要

引言

忧郁症是否为一种独特的综合征长期以来一直存在争议。一个有效综合征的一个方面是它是否有助于判断预后。本研究的目的是调查忧郁性抑郁症与非忧郁性抑郁症的病程,重点关注:(i)首次抑郁发作恢复的时间和概率,(ii)首次复发的时间和风险,(iii)复发率,(iv)抑郁或服用抗抑郁药物的时间,以及(v)自杀风险。

方法

隆德比研究是一项关于心理健康的纵向社区研究,对一个地理区域界定的人群(n = 3563)在1947年至1997年期间进行了长达50年的跟踪。首次发作抑郁症的受试者使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的忧郁症说明符被评估为忧郁性(n = 46)或非忧郁性(n = 381)。这些诊断是通过回顾性分析,利用来自精神科医生、关键信息提供者、登记册和患者记录的半结构化访谈中的所有可用信息做出的。

结果

我们发现,在首次抑郁发作恢复的时间和概率方面,忧郁性抑郁症与非忧郁性抑郁症之间没有显著差异。忧郁性抑郁症首次复发的时间比非忧郁性抑郁症短,忧郁性抑郁症组首次复发的风险是非忧郁性抑郁症组的2.77倍(95%置信区间[CI] 1.83 - 4.20)。忧郁性抑郁症组的复发率中位数较高,处于风险中的每年复发率为0.19次(四分位间距[IQR] 0.08 - 0.47),相比之下,非忧郁性抑郁症组处于风险中的每年复发率为0.10次(IQR 0.05 - 0.21)(p < 0.03)。忧郁性抑郁症组抑郁或服用抗抑郁药物的时间中位数百分比更高,为17%(IQR 3 - 20%),相比之下,非忧郁性抑郁症组为8%(IQR 7 - 33%)(p < 0.001)。忧郁性抑郁症组的自杀风险更高,风险比为4.13(95% CI 1.49 - 11.48,p < 0.01)。

讨论

总之,在隆德比人群中,忧郁性抑郁症比非忧郁性抑郁症有更易复发、更慢性且更严重的病程,自杀风险更高。尽管我们使用回顾性诊断可能会限制对结果的解释,但研究结果表明,忧郁症可能有助于判断预后,可能是一种有效的精神病理综合征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验