Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者的间质性肺疾病:与隐源性纤维性肺泡炎5年的比较。

Interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis over 5 years.

作者信息

Rajasekaran Arvind, Shovlin David, Saravanan Vadivelu, Lord Philip, Kelly Clive

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2006 Jul;33(7):1250-3. Epub 2006 Jun 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is little information on the natural history of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (CFA) is known to have a poor longterm prognosis, and we compared the 2 conditions through a longitudinal prospective study.

METHODS

We previously compared baseline clinical, physiological, and radiological characteristics in 18 RA-ILD patients with 18 case controls with CFA. Clinical, physiological, and radiological assessment was repeated in all survivors at 5 years, and data on treatment and mortality were collected.

RESULTS

The median age in each group was 77 years and 10 patients in each group were male. More patients with RA-ILD survived to 5 years (8 RA-ILD vs 2 CFA; p = 0.03), and median survival was significantly longer for patients with RA-ILD (60 mo) compared to CFA (27 mo; p <or= 0.05). Death was due to respiratory failure in half the patients with CFA, but was more often due to other causes in patients with RA. Clubbing and reduced baseline gas transfer were predictors of poor prognosis, while normal technetium clearance enhanced survival in nonsmokers.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RA-ILD did better than those with CFA, and died less often from respiratory failure. Patients with finger clubbing and/or low gas transfer declined more rapidly.

摘要

目的

关于类风湿关节炎(RA)合并间质性肺疾病(ILD)患者的自然病史,相关信息较少。已知隐源性纤维性肺泡炎(CFA)的长期预后较差,我们通过一项纵向前瞻性研究对这两种情况进行了比较。

方法

我们之前比较了18例RA-ILD患者与18例CFA对照患者的基线临床、生理和放射学特征。对所有幸存者在5年时重复进行临床、生理和放射学评估,并收集治疗和死亡率数据。

结果

每组的中位年龄均为77岁,每组均有10例男性患者。更多的RA-ILD患者存活至5年(8例RA-ILD患者 vs 2例CFA患者;p = 0.03),与CFA患者(27个月;p≤0.05)相比,RA-ILD患者的中位生存期明显更长(60个月)。CFA患者中有一半死于呼吸衰竭,但RA患者更多死于其他原因。杵状指和基线气体交换降低是预后不良的预测因素,而锝清除正常可提高非吸烟者的生存率。

结论

RA-ILD患者的情况比CFA患者更好,死于呼吸衰竭的情况更少。有杵状指和/或气体交换功能低下的患者病情进展更快。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验