Koch Tom
Department of Geography, Medical, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2Z1, Canada.
J Med Philos. 2006 Jun;31(3):251-67. doi: 10.1080/03605310600712851.
For all its apparent debate bioethical discourse is in fact very narrow. The discussion that occurs is typically within limited parameters, rarely fundamental. Nor does it accommodate divergent perspectives with ease. The reason lies in its ideology and the political and economic perspectives that ideology promotes. Here the ideology of bioethics' fundamental axioms is critiqued as arbitrary and exclusive rather than necessary and inclusive. The result unpacks the ideological and political underpinnings of bioethical thinking and suggests new avenues for a broader debate over fundamentals, and a different approach to bioethical debate.
尽管表面上存在诸多争议,但生物伦理话语实际上非常狭隘。所进行的讨论通常局限于有限的范围,很少触及根本问题。它也难以轻松容纳不同的观点。原因在于其意识形态以及该意识形态所倡导的政治和经济观点。在此,生物伦理基本公理的意识形态被批判为武断和排他的,而非必要和包容的。结果揭示了生物伦理思维的意识形态和政治基础,并为更广泛的关于基本问题的辩论以及生物伦理辩论的不同方法提出了新途径。