Newell Christopher
Medical Education Unit, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 73, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia.
J Med Philos. 2006 Jun;31(3):269-83. doi: 10.1080/03605310600712901.
In this article I explore disability as far more than individual private tragedy, suggesting it has a social location and reproduction. Within this context we look at the power relations associated with bioethics and its largely uncritical use of the biomedical model. Within that context the topics of genetics, euthanasia, and biotechnology are explored. In examining these topics a social account of disability is proposed as rejected knowledge. Accordingly we explore the political nature of bioethics as a project.
在本文中,我探讨的残疾远不止是个人的私人悲剧,表明它具有社会定位和复制性。在此背景下,我们审视与生物伦理学相关的权力关系及其对生物医学模式的大量不加批判的运用。在该背景下,对遗传学、安乐死和生物技术等主题进行探讨。在研究这些主题时,提出一种关于残疾的社会观点,将其视为被拒斥的知识。因此,我们探究生物伦理学作为一个项目的政治本质。