Davidson Karina W, Haas Donald C, Shimbo Daichi, Pickering Thomas G, Jonas Bruce S
College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Jun;8(6):411-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05368.x.
Whether systolic blood pressure (SBP) or pulse pressure (PP) is more predictive of coronary heart disease remains controversial. The authors analyzed 6032 participants in the first National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES I) followed up for an average of 16 years. Blood pressure was measured at baseline and coronary heart disease outcomes were determined from hospital or mortality records. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to estimate the multivariate-adjusted relative risk (RR) for increases of 10 mm Hg or 1 SD in SBP and PP, and the RR associated with PP was greater than the RR associated with SBP when using an increase of 10 mm Hg. However, when using an increase of 1 SD, the RR associated with SBP was larger than for PP. Although both are predictors, the authors conclude that SBP has a larger RR than PP for coronary heart disease events.
收缩压(SBP)和脉压(PP)哪一个对冠心病更具预测性仍存在争议。作者分析了第一次全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES I)中的6032名参与者,平均随访了16年。在基线时测量血压,并根据医院记录或死亡率记录确定冠心病结局。采用Cox比例风险分析来估计SBP和PP升高10 mmHg或1个标准差时的多变量调整相对风险(RR),当SBP升高10 mmHg时,与PP相关的RR大于与SBP相关的RR。然而,当升高1个标准差时,与SBP相关的RR大于PP。虽然两者都是预测因素,但作者得出结论,对于冠心病事件,SBP的RR比PP更大。