Suppr超能文献

标准化收缩压与脉压比较以预测冠心病。

Standardizing the comparison of systolic blood pressure vs. pulse pressure for predicting coronary heart disease.

作者信息

Davidson Karina W, Haas Donald C, Shimbo Daichi, Pickering Thomas G, Jonas Bruce S

机构信息

College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Jun;8(6):411-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05368.x.

Abstract

Whether systolic blood pressure (SBP) or pulse pressure (PP) is more predictive of coronary heart disease remains controversial. The authors analyzed 6032 participants in the first National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES I) followed up for an average of 16 years. Blood pressure was measured at baseline and coronary heart disease outcomes were determined from hospital or mortality records. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to estimate the multivariate-adjusted relative risk (RR) for increases of 10 mm Hg or 1 SD in SBP and PP, and the RR associated with PP was greater than the RR associated with SBP when using an increase of 10 mm Hg. However, when using an increase of 1 SD, the RR associated with SBP was larger than for PP. Although both are predictors, the authors conclude that SBP has a larger RR than PP for coronary heart disease events.

摘要

收缩压(SBP)和脉压(PP)哪一个对冠心病更具预测性仍存在争议。作者分析了第一次全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES I)中的6032名参与者,平均随访了16年。在基线时测量血压,并根据医院记录或死亡率记录确定冠心病结局。采用Cox比例风险分析来估计SBP和PP升高10 mmHg或1个标准差时的多变量调整相对风险(RR),当SBP升高10 mmHg时,与PP相关的RR大于与SBP相关的RR。然而,当升高1个标准差时,与SBP相关的RR大于PP。虽然两者都是预测因素,但作者得出结论,对于冠心病事件,SBP的RR比PP更大。

相似文献

5
Blood pressure variables and cardiovascular risk: new findings from ADVANCE.血压变量与心血管风险:ADVANCE研究的新发现
Hypertension. 2009 Aug;54(2):399-404. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.133041. Epub 2009 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of obesity and pulse pressure with hypertension in an Iranian urban population.伊朗城市人口中肥胖及脉压与高血压的关联
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):4705-4711. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_723_20. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Which components of the arterial pressure wave best predict risk?动脉压力波的哪些成分最能预测风险?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Jul;8(7):530-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05124.x.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验