Madsen Anders L
HUGIN Expert A/S, Aalborg, Denmark.
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2006 Jun;36(3):636-48. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2005.862488.
Improving the performance of belief updating becomes increasingly important as real-world Bayesian networks continue to grow larger and more complex. In this paper, an investigation is done on how variations over the message-computation algorithm of lazy propagation may impact its performance. Lazy propagation is a junction-tree-based inference algorithm for belief updating in Bayesian networks. Lazy propagation combines variable elimination (VE) with a Shenoy-Shafer message-passing scheme in an attempt to exploit the independence properties induced by evidence in a junction-tree-based algorithm. The authors investigate, the use of arc reversal (AR) and symbolic probabilistic inference (SPI) as alternative algorithms for computing clique-to-clique messages in lazy propagation. The paper presents the results of an empirical evaluation of the performance of lazy propagation using AR, SPI, and VE as the message-computation algorithm. The results of the empirical evaluation show that no single algorithm outperforms or is outperformed by the other two alternatives. In many cases, there is no significant difference in the performance of the three algorithms.
随着现实世界中的贝叶斯网络持续变得更大且更复杂,提高信念更新的性能变得愈发重要。本文针对懒惰传播的消息计算算法的变化如何影响其性能展开了一项研究。懒惰传播是一种用于贝叶斯网络中信念更新的基于连接树的推理算法。懒惰传播将变量消除(VE)与谢诺伊 - 谢弗消息传递方案相结合,试图在基于连接树的算法中利用证据所诱导的独立性属性。作者研究了使用弧反转(AR)和符号概率推理(SPI)作为在懒惰传播中计算团到团消息的替代算法。本文展示了以AR、SPI和VE作为消息计算算法时懒惰传播性能的实证评估结果。实证评估结果表明,没有一种算法比其他两种替代算法表现更优或更差。在许多情况下,这三种算法的性能没有显著差异。