• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Promoting stair climbing: effects of message specificity and validation.

作者信息

Webb Oliver J, Eves Frank F

机构信息

The School of Sport.xercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2007 Feb;22(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl045. Epub 2006 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyl045
PMID:16763074
Abstract

Current exercise guidelines encourage the daily accumulation of lifestyle activities, such as stair climbing. Although several studies show that visual prompts can increase stair usage, there has been little systematic assessment of the messages employed. Some of the messages used in previous interventions represent general descriptions of stair climbing (e.g. 'free exercise'), while others emphasize specific consequences of stair use (e.g. 'keeps you fit'). Twelve hundred structured interviews were conducted in order to establish which type of message is more persuasive. In addition, half of the interviewees were told that the messages were true, in order to assess how validating messages may influence their persuasive appeal. Results suggest that messages focussing on specific consequences are more persuasive than those providing general descriptions and that validating the information presented in stair-climbing interventions may increase their efficacy. Previous messages may not, therefore, have demonstrated the full potential of stair climbing as a model for increasing population activity levels.

摘要

相似文献

1
Promoting stair climbing: effects of message specificity and validation.
Health Educ Res. 2007 Feb;22(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl045. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
2
Promoting stair climbing in Barcelona: similarities and differences with interventions in English-speaking populations.促进巴塞罗那的楼梯攀爬:与英语国家干预措施的异同。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Feb;20(1):100-2. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp059. Epub 2009 May 12.
3
Promoting stair climbing: stair-riser banners are better than posters... sometimes.推广爬楼梯:楼梯竖板横幅有时比海报效果更好。
Prev Med. 2008 Apr;46(4):308-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.009. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
4
A workplace intervention to promote stair climbing: greater effects in the overweight.一项促进爬楼梯的工作场所干预措施:对超重者效果更佳。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Dec;14(12):2210-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.259.
5
Effectiveness and cost of two stair-climbing interventions-less is more.两种爬楼梯干预措施的效果和成本——少即是多。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(4):231-6. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090325-QUAN-119.
6
Investigating message-framing effects in the context of a tailored intervention promoting physical activity.在促进身体活动的定制干预背景下研究信息框架效应。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Apr;25(2):343-54. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp061. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
7
When 'fit' leads to fit, and when 'fit' leads to fat: how message framing and intrinsic vs. extrinsic exercise outcomes interact in promoting physical activity.当“健康”带来健康,当“健康”带来肥胖:信息框架和内在与外在运动结果如何相互作用,促进身体活动。
Psychol Health. 2011 Jul;26(7):819-34. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2010.505983. Epub 2011 May 24.
8
An informational stair climbing intervention with greater effects in overweight pedestrians.信息型爬楼梯干预对超重行人的效果更大。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Dec;25(6):936-44. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq043. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
9
Promoting routine stair use: evaluating the impact of a stair prompt across buildings.促进日常使用楼梯:评估跨建筑的楼梯提示的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.005.
10
Promoting exercise behaviour: an integration of persuasion theories and the theory of planned behaviour.促进运动行为:说服理论与计划行为理论的整合
Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Nov;9(Pt 4):505-21. doi: 10.1348/1359107042304605.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing messages to encourage healthy, sustainable dietary substitutions: A qualitative study with US emerging adults.制定鼓励健康、可持续饮食替代的信息:一项针对美国新兴成年人的定性研究。
Appetite. 2024 Apr 1;195:107223. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107223. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
2
A longitudinal controlled signage intervention to increase stair use at university buildings: Process and impact evaluation using RE-AIM framework.一项旨在增加大学建筑楼梯使用的纵向对照标识干预措施:使用 RE-AIM 框架进行的过程和影响评估。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;11:1079241. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1079241. eCollection 2023.
3
Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use.
决策点提示的来源可信度是否重要?一项提高楼梯使用量的准实验现场研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 21;14(11):e0225520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225520. eCollection 2019.
4
Repetitive daily point of choice prompts and occupational sit-stand transfers, concentration and neuromuscular performance in office workers: an RCT.重复性日常选择点提示与办公室职员的职业坐立转换、注意力及神经肌肉表现:一项随机对照试验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 20;12(4):4340-53. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120404340.
5
A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention.针对工作场所热量消耗的多组件楼梯攀登推广活动;一项准实验研究,测试对行为、态度和意愿的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 11;12:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-423.