• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一组阿联酋人的整体与前牙大小比例

Overall and Anterior Tooth Size Ratios in a Group of Emiratis.

作者信息

Mohammad Moaza Ghuloom, Din Shazia Naser-Ud, Khamis Amar Hassan, Athanasiou Athanasios E

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Orthodontic Clinic, Al Mizhar Health Center, Primary Health Care Center, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Open Dent J. 2018 Sep 28;12:655-663. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010655. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2174/1745017901814010655
PMID:30369975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6182878/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this investigation in a group of Emiratis were () To study overall and anterior tooth size ratios in Class I normal occlusion, () To estimate overall and anterior tooth size ratios in different malocclusion groups, () To compare overall and anterior tooth size ratios in Class I normal occlusion with the Bolton standards, and () To determine the distribution of overall and anterior tooth size ratios ± 2 SD from Bolton mean values in all occlusion groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional investigation, consecutive patients' files, including dental casts, were selected from the archives of orthodontic clinics of the Dubai Health Authority. The final sample was formed following the application of specific inclusion criteria. The sample consisted of 521 pairs of dental casts representing both sexes (males: 188; females: 333) and different malocclusion groups (Class I: 288; Class II: 110; Class III: 30) and Class I normal occlusion (93). The mean age of patients was 16.18y for Class I, 15.73y for Class II, 15.83y for Class III, and 16.55y for Class I normal occlusion. The dental casts were scanned and digitized by the first author using the Ortho Insight 3D laser scanner. Measurements were made regarding maxillary and mandibular sums of mesiodistal tooth dimension of the overall (6-6) and anterior (3-3) groups of teeth. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, paired -test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was set at <0.05.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences among malocclusion groups with regard to overall and anterior tooth size ratios. However, the comparison between the Class I normal occlusion group and the Bolton standards showed no statistically significant differences. Only five cases in Class II malocclusion presented an anterior tooth size discrepancy outside plus 2 SD from Bolton mean values and one case in Class I malocclusion presented with an overall tooth size discrepancy outside plus 2 SD from Bolton mean values.

CONCLUSION

This study of the different occlusion groups of the Emirati sample concluded that () Class I normal occlusion cases presented similar overall and anterior tooth size ratios to Bolton standards; () Overall and anterior tooth size ratios among different malocclusion groups exhibited statistically significant differences; () Five cases in Class II malocclusion presented an anterior tooth size discrepancy outside plus 2 SD from Bolton mean values, and () One case in Class I malocclusion presented an overall tooth size discrepancy outside plus 2 SD from Bolton mean values.

摘要

目的

本研究针对一组阿联酋人的目的是:()研究I类正常咬合中全牙和前牙的大小比例;()估计不同错牙合畸形组中的全牙和前牙大小比例;()将I类正常咬合中的全牙和前牙大小比例与博尔顿标准进行比较;()确定所有咬合组中全牙和前牙大小比例相对于博尔顿平均值±2标准差的分布情况。

材料与方法

在这项横断面研究中,从迪拜卫生局正畸诊所的档案中选取了连续患者的病历,包括牙模。在应用特定纳入标准后形成最终样本。样本包括521对牙模,代表不同性别(男性:188例;女性:333例)以及不同错牙合畸形组(I类:288例;II类:110例;III类:30例)和I类正常咬合(93例)。I类患者的平均年龄为16.18岁,II类为15.73岁,III类为15.83岁,I类正常咬合为16.55岁。第一作者使用Ortho Insight 3D激光扫描仪对牙模进行扫描和数字化处理。对上颌和下颌总体(6 - 6)和前牙(3 - 3)组牙齿的近远中牙尺寸总和进行测量。统计分析包括描述性统计、配对t检验和方差分析(ANOVA)。显著性水平设定为<0.05。

结果

在错牙合畸形组之间,全牙和前牙大小比例存在统计学上的显著差异。然而,I类正常咬合组与博尔顿标准之间的比较未显示出统计学上的显著差异。II类错牙合畸形中只有5例前牙大小差异超出博尔顿平均值加2标准差,I类错牙合畸形中有1例全牙大小差异超出博尔顿平均值加2标准差。

结论

这项针对阿联酋样本不同咬合组的研究得出结论:()I类正常咬合病例的全牙和前牙大小比例与博尔顿标准相似;()不同错牙合畸形组之间的全牙和前牙大小比例存在统计学上的显著差异;()II类错牙合畸形中有5例前牙大小差异超出博尔顿平均值加2标准差;()I类错牙合畸形中有1例全牙大小差异超出博尔顿平均值加2标准差。

相似文献

1
Overall and Anterior Tooth Size Ratios in a Group of Emiratis.一组阿联酋人的整体与前牙大小比例
Open Dent J. 2018 Sep 28;12:655-663. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010655. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of Bolton ratio in normal occlusion and different malocclusion groups in Iranian population.伊朗人群中正常咬合与不同错牙合组的 Bolton 比率比较。
Int Orthod. 2019 Mar;17(1):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
[Analysis of interjaw ratios in relation to permanent tooth size in subjects with class I malocclusion].[对Ⅰ类错牙合畸形患者颌间比例与恒牙大小关系的分析]
Med Pregl. 2010 May-Jun;63(5-6):343-8. doi: 10.2298/mpns1006343f.
4
Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and malocclusion: is there a relation?颌间牙大小差异与错牙合畸形:它们之间有关系吗?
Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):208-13. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0204:ITSDAM>2.0.CO;2.
5
[A study of Bolton tooth-size discrepancies of malocclusion patients].[错(牙合)畸形患者Bolton牙量不调的研究]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jun;21(3):211-2, 216.
6
Measuring tooth size discrepancies using Bolton analysis: a comparative cross-sectional study among major ethnicity in Malaysia.采用 Bolton 分析测量牙齿大小差异:马来西亚主要种族的横断面比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03185-7.
7
Association between Bolton discrepancy and Angle malocclusions.博尔顿差异与安氏错牙合之间的关联。
Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1-6. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0116. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Digital evaluation of Bolton's tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions categories of Egyptian adolescent orthodontic population: A retrospective study.埃及青少年错颌畸形人群中不同错颌类型的 Bolton 牙齿大小差异的数字化评估:一项回顾性研究。
Int Orthod. 2022 Sep;20(3):100660. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100660. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
9
Bolton ratios in Portuguese subjects among different malocclusion groups.不同错颌畸形组中葡萄牙受试者的 Bolton 比率。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Sep 1;10(9):e864-e868. doi: 10.4317/jced.54977. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
[Bolton tooth-size discrepancy among different skeletal malocclusion groups].[不同骨骼错牙合畸形组之间的 Bolton 牙量不调]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2009 Jun;18(3):251-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Dental Analysis in Subjects with Skeletal Malocclusion: A Retrospective Observational Study.骨性错牙合畸形患者的三维牙齿分析:一项回顾性观察研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jun 22;13(7):280. doi: 10.3390/dj13070280.
2
A study to estimate tooth size discrepancy values specific to Saudi orthodontic patients: A systematic review and -analysis.一项评估沙特正畸患者特定牙齿大小差异值的研究:系统评价与分析。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Jul;35(5):498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
The Tooth Size Discrepancy among Orthodontic Patients and Normal Occlusion Individuals from Saudi Arabia: A Three-Dimensional Scan Analysis of Diagnostic Casts.沙特阿拉伯正畸患者与正常咬合个体之间的牙齿大小差异:诊断模型的三维扫描分析
Contemp Clin Dent. 2020 Apr-Jun;11(2):141-149. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_455_19. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images.与石膏模型(金标准)和锥形束计算机断层扫描图像相比,在激光扫描数字模型中测量的Bolton分析的准确性。
Korean J Orthod. 2016 Jan;46(1):13-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.13. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
2
Bolton tooth size ratio among Sudanese Population sample: A preliminary study.苏丹人群样本中博尔顿牙尺寸比例:一项初步研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2015 Jul-Sep;4(3):77-82. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.160240.
3
Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.牙齿颊舌向倾斜度的测量:手工技术与三维软件。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Oct;146(4):522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.06.018.
4
Mesiodistal tooth width and tooth size discrepancies of Yemeni Arabians: A pilot study.也门阿拉伯人的近远中牙宽度和牙齿大小差异:一项初步研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2012 Apr;1(2):40-5. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.99760.
5
Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies.不同技术在口腔测量中的准确性、可重复性和时间效率。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.012.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.无印模数字化模型的诊断准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):916-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.024.
7
Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?数字化与石膏研究模型:它们的准确性和可重复性如何?
J Orthod. 2012 Sep;39(3):151-9. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000023.
8
Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies.临床研究的样本量估计与效能分析。
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012 Jan;5(1):7-13. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.97779.
9
Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.数字化研究模型与石膏模型的正畸测量比较:系统评价。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011 Feb;14(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
10
Bolton's intermaxillary tooth size ratios among Iranian schoolchildren.伊朗学童的 Bolton 颌间牙量比率。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jul 1;16(4):e568-72. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e568.