Bisset Linda, Cossart Yvonne E, Selby Warwick, West Richard, Catterson Denise, O'hara Kate, Vickery Karen
Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology and The Australian Centre for Hepatitis Virology, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Jun;34(5):274-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.007.
Patient-ready endoscopes were monitored over an 80-week period to determine the efficacy of decontamination procedures in a busy endoscopy center. Decontamination failure was related to patient and procedural parameters.
Samples from patient-ready endoscopes were cultured aerobically and anaerobically and subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV. PCR to detect coliforms from 109 culture negative washes was used as a surrogate marker for biofilm in endoscopes. PCR was used to detect the presence of Helicobactor pylori in endoscopes used on infected patients. Procedural information such as biopsy retrieval, endoscope number, diagnosis, attending personnel, and decontamination system procedures was collected.
Gastroscopes (n = 1,376) and colonoscopes (n = 987) were equally contaminated (1.8% vs 1.9%, respectively) with low numbers of organisms commonly isolated from the nasopharynx and/or feces. Only 1 wash contained viral nucleic acid (HCV). There was a significant correlation (P < .001) between the number of times a patient-ready endoscope was contaminated and its frequency of use. Colonoscopes used on patients with gastrointestinal disease were significantly more likely to remain contaminated through the decontamination process (P < .05). All other patient, staff, and decontamination system parameters remained not statistically significant. Coliform DNA was detected in 40% of culture-negative washes collected from patient-ready endoscopes, suggesting the presence of biofilm. No H pylori DNA was detected.
Recommended decontamination procedures do not entirely eliminate persistence of low numbers of organisms on a few endoscopes, but this is unlikely to cause serious consequences in patients. Bacterial biofilm is difficult to remove and may explain this low-level persistence.
在一个繁忙的内镜检查中心,对已准备好用于患者的内镜进行了为期80周的监测,以确定去污程序的效果。去污失败与患者和操作参数有关。
对已准备好用于患者的内镜样本进行需氧和厌氧培养,并进行聚合酶链反应(PCR)以检测乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)。对109次培养阴性冲洗液进行检测大肠菌群的PCR,作为内镜中生物膜的替代标志物。使用PCR检测感染患者使用的内镜中幽门螺杆菌的存在。收集活检取材、内镜编号、诊断、主治人员和去污系统程序等操作信息。
胃镜(n = 1376)和结肠镜(n = 987)的污染情况相同(分别为1.8%和1.9%),污染菌数量较少,常见于鼻咽部和/或粪便中。只有1次冲洗液含有病毒核酸(HCV)。已准备好用于患者的内镜被污染的次数与其使用频率之间存在显著相关性(P < .001)。用于胃肠道疾病患者的结肠镜在去污过程中更有可能仍被污染(P < .05)。所有其他患者、工作人员和去污系统参数在统计学上均无显著意义。在从已准备好用于患者的内镜收集的40%培养阴性冲洗液中检测到大肠菌群DNA,表明存在生物膜。未检测到幽门螺杆菌DNA。
推荐的去污程序并不能完全消除少数内镜上低数量微生物的残留,但这在患者中不太可能造成严重后果。细菌生物膜难以去除,这可能解释了这种低水平的残留情况。