Pannu Ravinder, Singh Inderjit
Centre for Developmental Neurological Disorders, Charles P. Darby Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Neurochem Int. 2006 Jul;49(2):170-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2006.04.010. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is one of three NOS isoforms generating nitric oxide (NO) by the conversion of l-arginine to l-citrulline. iNOS has been found to be a major contributor to initiation/exacerbation of the central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory/degenerative conditions through the production of excessive NO which generates reactive nitrogen species (RNSs). Activation of iNOS and NO generation has come to be accepted as a marker and therapeutic target in neuroinflammatory conditions such as those observed in ischemia, multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord injury (SCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and inherited peroxisomal (e.g. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy; X-ALD) and lysosomal disorders (e.g. Krabbe's disease). However, with the emergence of reports on the neuroprotective facets of NO, the prior dogma about NO being solely detrimental has had to be modified. While RNSs such as peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)) have been linked to lipid peroxidation, neuronal/oligodendrocyte loss, and demyelination in neurodegenerative diseases, limited NO generation by GSNO has been found to promote vasodilation and attenuate vascular injury under the same ischemic conditions. NO generated from GSNO acts as second messenger molecular which through S-nitrosylation has been shown to control important cellular processes by regulation of expression/activity of certain proteins such as NF-kappaB. It is now believed that the environment and the context in which NO is produced largely determines the actions (good or bad) of this molecule. These multi-faceted aspects of NO make therapeutic interference with iNOS activity even more complicated since complete ablation of iNOS activity has been found to be rather more detrimental than protective in most neurodegenerative conditions. Investigators in search of iNOS modulating pharmacological agents have realized the need of a delicate balance so as to allow the production of physiologically relevant amounts of NO (such as those required for host defence/neutotransmission/vasodilation, etc.) but at the same time block the generation of RNSs through repressing excessive NO levels (such as those causing neuronal/tissue damage and demyelination, etc.). The past years have seen a noteworthy increase in novel agents that might prove useful in achieving the aim of harnessing the good and blocking the undesirable actions of NO. It is the aim of this review to provide basic insights into the NOS family of enzymes with special emphasis of the role of iNOS in the CNS, in the first part. In the second part of the review, we will strive to provide an exhaustive compilation of the prevalent strategies being tested for the therapeutic modulation of iNOS and NO production.
诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)是三种一氧化氮合酶同工型之一,通过将L-精氨酸转化为L-瓜氨酸来生成一氧化氮(NO)。已发现iNOS通过产生过量的NO进而生成活性氮物质(RNSs),在中枢神经系统(CNS)炎症/退行性疾病的起始/加重过程中起主要作用。iNOS的激活和NO的生成已被公认为是神经炎症性疾病的一个标志物和治疗靶点,如在缺血、多发性硬化症(MS)、脊髓损伤(SCI)、阿尔茨海默病(AD)以及遗传性过氧化物酶体疾病(如X连锁肾上腺脑白质营养不良;X-ALD)和溶酶体疾病(如克拉伯病)中观察到的情况。然而,随着关于NO神经保护作用的报道不断出现,先前认为NO完全有害的教条不得不被修正。虽然诸如过氧亚硝酸盐(ONOO(-))等RNSs与神经退行性疾病中的脂质过氧化、神经元/少突胶质细胞丢失和脱髓鞘有关,但已发现在相同的缺血条件下,GSNO产生的有限NO可促进血管舒张并减轻血管损伤。GSNO产生的NO作为第二信使分子,通过S-亚硝基化已被证明可通过调节某些蛋白质(如NF-κB)的表达/活性来控制重要的细胞过程。现在人们认为,NO产生的环境和背景在很大程度上决定了该分子的作用(有益或有害)。NO的这些多方面特性使得对iNOS活性的治疗性干预更加复杂,因为在大多数神经退行性疾病中,完全消除iNOS活性已被发现其有害性大于保护性。寻找iNOS调节药物的研究人员已经意识到需要一种微妙的平衡,以便产生生理相关量的NO(如宿主防御/神经传递/血管舒张等所需的量),但同时通过抑制过量的NO水平(如那些导致神经元/组织损伤和脱髓鞘等的水平)来阻断RNSs的生成。在过去几年中,可能有助于实现利用NO的有益作用并阻断其不良作用这一目标的新型药物有了显著增加。本综述的目的,第一部分是对一氧化氮合酶家族酶提供基本见解,特别强调iNOS在中枢神经系统中的作用。在综述的第二部分,我们将努力详尽汇编目前正在测试的用于治疗性调节iNOS和NO生成的流行策略。