• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑个体中情绪一致性自由回忆偏差并非反应偏差的结果。

Mood-congruent free recall bias in anxious individuals is not a consequence of response bias.

作者信息

Russo Riccardo, Whittuck Dora, Roberson Debi, Dutton Kevin, Georgiou George, Fox Elaine

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

出版信息

Memory. 2006 May;14(4):393-9. doi: 10.1080/09658210500343166.

DOI:10.1080/09658210500343166
PMID:16766443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1852640/
Abstract

The status of mood-congruent free recall bias in anxious individuals was evaluated following incidental encoding of target words. Individuals with high and low levels of trait anxiety completed a modified Stroop task, which revealed an attentional bias for threat-related stimuli in anxious individuals. This group was significantly slower in naming the colour in which threat-related words were displayed compared to neutral words. In a subsequent free recall test for the words used in the modified Stroop task, anxious individuals recalled more threat-related words compared to low-anxious people. This difference was significant even when controlling for the false recall of items that had not been presented during study. These results support the view put forward by Russo, Fox, Bellinger, and Nguyen-Van-Tam (2001) that mood-congruent free recall bias in anxious individuals can be observed if the target material is encoded at a relatively shallow level. Moreover, contrary to Dowens and Calvo (2003), the current results show that the memory advantage for threat-related information in anxious individuals is not a consequence of response bias.

摘要

在对目标词进行 incidental 编码后,评估了焦虑个体中情绪一致性自由回忆偏差的状况。特质焦虑水平高和低的个体完成了一项改良的 Stroop 任务,该任务揭示了焦虑个体对威胁相关刺激的注意偏差。与中性词相比,该组在命名显示威胁相关词的颜色时明显更慢。在随后对改良 Stroop 任务中使用的单词进行的自由回忆测试中,与低焦虑人群相比,焦虑个体回忆起更多与威胁相关的单词。即使在控制了研究期间未呈现项目的错误回忆时,这种差异仍然显著。这些结果支持了 Russo、Fox、Bellinger 和 Nguyen-Van-Tam(2001 年)提出的观点,即如果目标材料在相对较浅的水平上进行编码,那么在焦虑个体中可以观察到情绪一致性自由回忆偏差。此外,与 Dowens 和 Calvo(2003 年)相反,当前结果表明,焦虑个体中对威胁相关信息的记忆优势不是反应偏差的结果。

相似文献

1
Mood-congruent free recall bias in anxious individuals is not a consequence of response bias.焦虑个体中情绪一致性自由回忆偏差并非反应偏差的结果。
Memory. 2006 May;14(4):393-9. doi: 10.1080/09658210500343166.
2
Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat-related information?焦虑会导致对威胁相关信息的选择性加工吗?
Behav Res Ther. 1991;29(2):147-60. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(91)90043-3.
3
Attentional bias in anxiety: selective or not?焦虑中的注意偏向:是否具有选择性?
Behav Res Ther. 1993 Jun;31(5):487-93. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90129-i.
4
Mood-congruent attention and memory bias in dysphoria: Exploring the coherence among information-processing biases.心境一致的注意和抑郁中的记忆偏差:探索信息处理偏差之间的一致性。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Mar;48(3):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
5
Attentional bias in high- and low-anxious individuals: evidence for threat-induced effects on engagement and disengagement.高焦虑和低焦虑个体的注意偏向:威胁引起的投入和解除投入效应的证据。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Aug;25(5):805-17. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.515065. Epub 2011 May 24.
6
The emotional Stroop interference effect in anxiety: attentional bias or cognitive avoidance?焦虑中的情绪性斯特鲁普干扰效应:注意偏向还是认知回避?
Behav Res Ther. 1994 Mar;32(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90128-7.
7
Depth of processing and recall of threat material in fearful and nonfearful individuals.恐惧和非恐惧个体中对威胁性材料的加工深度与回忆
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2007 Sep;20(3):223-37. doi: 10.1080/10615800701415423.
8
Anxiety and memory: a recall bias for threatening words in high anxiety.焦虑与记忆:高焦虑状态下对威胁性词汇的回忆偏差。
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jun;35(6):531-42. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00001-6.
9
Anxious mood and memory.
Behav Res Ther. 1989;27(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(89)90072-7.
10
Attentional biases for threat after fear-related autobiographical recall.恐惧相关自传体回忆后对威胁的注意偏差。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 Jan;31(1):69-78. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2017.1362297. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of posed smiling on memory for happy and sad facial expressions.摆姿势微笑对快乐和悲伤面部表情记忆的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 18;11(1):10477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89828-7.
2
The influence of social anxiety-provoking contexts on context reinstatement effects.社交焦虑诱发情境对情境再现效应的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jul;74(7):1170-1184. doi: 10.1177/1747021821998489. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
Importance of trauma-related fear in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and early adverse life events.创伤相关恐惧在肠易激综合征患者及早期不良生活事件中的重要性。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Sep;32(9):e13896. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13896. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Emerging Directions in Emotional Episodic Memory.情绪性情景记忆的新方向
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 4;8:1867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01867. eCollection 2017.
5
Brief learning induces a memory bias for arousing-negative words: an fMRI study in high and low trait anxious persons.短暂学习引发对引发负面情绪词汇的记忆偏差:一项针对高特质焦虑和低特质焦虑人群的功能磁共振成像研究
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 21;6:1226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01226. eCollection 2015.
6
The Still Enigmatic Syndrome of Transient Global Amnesia: Interactions Between Neurological and Psychopathological Factors.短暂性全面遗忘症的未解之谜:神经和精神病理因素之间的相互作用。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2015 Jun;25(2):125-33. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9284-y. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
7
All in its proper time: monitoring the emergence of a memory bias for novel, arousing-negative words in individuals with high and low trait anxiety.一切都在恰当的时候:监测高特质焦虑和低特质焦虑个体中对新颖、引发负面情绪的词汇产生记忆偏差的情况。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 2;9(6):e98339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098339. eCollection 2014.
8
Emotional memory function, personality structure and psychopathology: a neural system approach to the identification of vulnerability markers.情绪记忆功能、人格结构与精神病理学:一种识别易感性标志物的神经系统方法。
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jun;58(1):71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.014. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

1
On the status of implicit memory bias in anxiety.关于焦虑中内隐记忆偏差的状况。
Cogn Emot. 1999 Jul 1;13(4):435-456. doi: 10.1080/026999399379258.
2
Mood-congruent free recall bias in anxiety.焦虑中的心境一致性自由回忆偏差。
Cogn Emot. 2001 Jul 1;15(4):419-433. doi: 10.1080/02699930125788.
3
Memory biases in the anxiety disorders: current status.焦虑症中的记忆偏差:现状
Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 May;22(4):587-627. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00113-1.
4
Interpreting Stroop interference: an analysis of differences between task versions.解读斯特鲁普干扰:任务版本间差异分析
Neuropsychology. 2001 Oct;15(4):462-71. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.15.4.462.
5
Explicit memory in anxiety disorders.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Feb;108(1):153-63. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.108.1.153.
6
The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.情绪斯特鲁普任务与精神病理学
Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):3-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3.
7
Implicit and explicit memory for emotion-congruent information in clinical depression and anxiety.临床抑郁症和焦虑症中对情绪一致信息的内隐记忆和外显记忆。
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Sep;33(7):755-70. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00029-w.
8
The cue-dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval.状态依赖检索的线索依赖特性。
Mem Cognit. 1980 Mar;8(2):157-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03213419.
9
Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states.
Behav Res Ther. 1985;23(5):563-9. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(85)90104-4.
10
Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states: a replication.焦虑状态下威胁线索的选择性加工:一项重复研究
Behav Res Ther. 1989;27(4):317-23. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(89)90001-6.