Eden Annuschka S, Dehmelt Vera, Bischoff Matthias, Zwitserlood Pienie, Kugel Harald, Keuper Kati, Zwanzger Peter, Dobel Christian
Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital of Münster Münster, Germany ; Institute of Psychology, University of Münster Münster, Germany.
Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Münster Münster, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 21;6:1226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01226. eCollection 2015.
Persons suffering from anxiety disorders display facilitated processing of arousing and negative stimuli, such as negative words. This memory bias is reflected in better recall and increased amygdala activity in response to such stimuli. However, individual learning histories were not considered in most studies, a concern that we meet here. Thirty-four female persons (half with high-, half with low trait anxiety) participated in a criterion-based associative word-learning paradigm, in which neutral pseudowords were paired with aversive or neutral pictures, which should lead to a valence change for the negatively paired pseudowords. After learning, pseudowords were tested with fMRI to investigate differential brain activation of the amygdala evoked by the newly acquired valence. Explicit and implicit memory was assessed directly after training and in three follow-ups at 4-day intervals. The behavioral results demonstrate that associative word-learning leads to an explicit (but no implicit) memory bias for negatively linked pseudowords, relative to neutral ones, which confirms earlier studies. Bilateral amygdala activation underlines the behavioral effect: Higher trait anxiety is correlated with stronger amygdala activation for negatively linked pseudowords than for neutrally linked ones. Most interestingly, this effect is also present for negatively paired pseudowords that participants could not remember well. Moreover, neutrally paired pseudowords evoked higher amygdala reactivity than completely novel ones in highly anxious persons, which can be taken as evidence for generalization. These findings demonstrate that few word-learning trials generate a memory bias for emotional stimuli, indexed both behaviorally and neurophysiologically. Importantly, the typical memory bias for emotional stimuli and the generalization to neutral ones is larger in high anxious persons.
患有焦虑症的人对唤起情绪和负面刺激(如负面词汇)的处理更为容易。这种记忆偏差表现为对这类刺激有更好的回忆以及杏仁核活动增强。然而,大多数研究并未考虑个体的学习经历,我们在此关注到了这一问题。34名女性(一半具有高特质焦虑,一半具有低特质焦虑)参与了基于标准的联想词汇学习范式,其中中性伪词与厌恶或中性图片配对,这应该会使与负面配对的伪词产生效价变化。学习后,使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)对伪词进行测试,以研究新获得的效价所诱发的杏仁核的差异脑激活情况。在训练后以及每隔4天进行的三次随访中直接评估外显记忆和内隐记忆。行为结果表明,相对于中性伪词,联想词汇学习会导致对与负面相关的伪词产生外显(而非内隐)记忆偏差,这证实了早期研究。双侧杏仁核激活突显了行为效应:高特质焦虑与对与负面相关伪词的杏仁核激活比与中性相关伪词的更强相关。最有趣的是,对于参与者记不太清楚的与负面配对的伪词,这种效应也存在。此外,在高焦虑人群中,与中性配对的伪词比全新的伪词诱发更高的杏仁核反应性,这可作为泛化的证据。这些发现表明,少量的词汇学习试验就能产生对情绪刺激的记忆偏差,这在行为和神经生理学上都有体现。重要的是,高焦虑人群中对情绪刺激的典型记忆偏差以及对中性刺激的泛化更大。