Fry L C, Carey E J, Shiff A D, Heigh R I, Sharma V K, Post J K, Hentz J G, Fleischer D E, Leighton J A
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, USA.
Endoscopy. 2006 May;38(5):498-502. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925340.
Capsule endoscopy, proven effective for evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected Crohn's disease, is increasingly used to investigate other small-intestine disorders, but its yield for other indications is not well known. We sought to evaluate its yield and findings for abdominal pain or diarrhea.
Medical records of patients with abdominal pain or diarrhea (> 6 weeks' duration) who underwent capsule endoscopy between August 2001 and June 2004 were retrospectively reviewed for demographic data, indications, findings, diagnoses, complications, and radiologic studies. All patients had previous endoscopic or radiologic examinations (colonoscopy, enteroscopy, upper endoscopy, small-bowel series, computed tomography enterography, or computed tomography) demonstrating no abnormalities sufficient for diagnosis.
64 patients (26 men; 38 women; mean age, 43 years; age range, 19 - 83 years) who met study criteria had 68 capsule endoscopy studies. Indications were abdominal pain (35 patients), diarrhea (14), or both (15). Complete small-bowel visualization with identification of the cecum was achieved in 81 %; yield of positive findings was 9 % (6 patients). By indications, the yield was 6 % for abdominal pain, 14 % for diarrhea, and 13 % for both. Diagnoses included Crohn's disease (3), enteropathy induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (2), and submucosal tumor (1). Capsule retention occurred in two patients, requiring surgical removal.
Capsule endoscopy had a low yield for evaluation of abdominal pain or diarrhea and cannot be recommended as a first-line test without further study. Nonetheless, it facilitated diagnosis in 9 % of patients with negative endoscopic and radiologic examinations.
胶囊内镜已被证实对不明原因的胃肠道出血及疑似克罗恩病的评估有效,现越来越多地用于其他小肠疾病的检查,但对于其他适应证的诊断率尚不清楚。我们旨在评估其对于腹痛或腹泻的诊断率及检查结果。
回顾性分析2001年8月至2004年6月期间因腹痛或腹泻(病程>6周)接受胶囊内镜检查的患者的病历,记录人口统计学数据、适应证、检查结果、诊断、并发症及影像学检查情况。所有患者此前均接受过内镜或影像学检查(结肠镜检查、小肠镜检查、上消化道内镜检查、小肠造影、计算机断层扫描小肠成像或计算机断层扫描),但均未发现足以确诊的异常情况。
符合研究标准的64例患者(26例男性,38例女性;平均年龄43岁;年龄范围19 - 83岁)共接受了68次胶囊内镜检查。适应证为腹痛(35例患者)、腹泻(14例)或两者兼有(15例)。81%的检查实现了对小肠的完整观察并识别出盲肠;阳性检查结果的诊断率为9%(6例患者)。按适应证分类,腹痛患者中的诊断率为6%,腹泻患者为14%,两者兼有的患者为13%。诊断包括克罗恩病(3例)、非甾体类抗炎药所致肠病(2例)及黏膜下肿瘤(1例)。两名患者出现胶囊滞留,需手术取出。
胶囊内镜对于腹痛或腹泻的评估诊断率较低,在未经进一步研究之前,不能推荐将其作为一线检查方法。尽管如此,它仍为9%的内镜及影像学检查阴性的患者提供了诊断帮助。