Haffner Christian, Giere Wolfgang, Loch Ernst-Gerhard, Rieck Gisela
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(3):203-7.
Scientific evaluation is a fundamental tool of effective quality assurance of continuing medical education (CME). The analysis of the evaluation system of the CME academy of one the German Regional Medical Associations has revealed both the strengths and weaknesses of this system, thus enabling the installation of a model-like quality control system. Of utmost importance is the construction of an evaluation form that must be designed for good selectivity of the items, and the quality of the event should be well represented by the evaluating questions. For comparison purposes, the evaluation form should be standardized according to international evaluation standards. The standards of the German Society of Evaluation (DeGEval) and the guidelines and recommendations of the German Medical Association are both suitable orientational aids for the evaluation form and the evaluation process. The assessment process should also follow international standardised principles; it should be timely and subjective elements of interpretation should be eliminated, which is required for the evaluation of continuing medical education to achieve credibility. Furthermore, it is also a prerequisite that consequences may follow from the evaluation of continuing medical education and the continuity of the quality assurance process.
科学评估是继续医学教育（CME）有效质量保证的基本工具。对德国一个地区医学协会的继续医学教育学院评估系统的分析揭示了该系统的优势和劣势，从而能够建立一个类似模型的质量控制系统。至关重要的是构建一个评估表，其项目设计必须具有良好的选择性，评估问题应能很好地体现活动质量。为便于比较，评估表应根据国际评估标准进行标准化。德国评估协会（DeGEval）的标准以及德国医学协会的指南和建议，对于评估表和评估过程都是合适的指导。评估过程也应遵循国际标准化原则；应及时进行，且应消除解释中的主观因素，这是继续医学教育评估获得可信度所必需的。此外，继续医学教育评估产生后果以及质量保证过程具有连续性也是一个前提条件。
