O'Leary Erin S, Schoenfeld Elinor R, Stevens Richard G, Kabat Geoffrey C, Henderson Kevin, Grimson Roger, Gammon Marilie D, Leske M Cristina
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Aug 15;164(4):358-66. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj211. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
The hypothesized association between breast cancer and circadian disruption was evaluated in the Electromagnetic Fields and Breast Cancer on Long Island Study. Participants included 576 women with breast cancer diagnosed from August 1996 to June 1997 and 585 population-based controls (87% and 83% participation rates, respectively) aged < 75 years and living in the same Long Island, New York, home for > or = 15 years. An in-person interview ascertained light-at-night exposure histories through shift work (previous 15 years) and at home (previous 5 years). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by unconditional multivariate logistic regression. Breast cancer was not associated with overall shift work (odds ratio (OR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 1.38) or evening shift work (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.44). However, overnight shift workers were at lower risk than women never working shifts (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.94). Women who frequently turned on lights at home during sleep hours (> or = twice/week and > or = twice/night) had increased risks (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.69). The latter results suggest positive associations with residential light-at-night exposure, or they could reflect response biases. Furthermore, overall and evening shift work were not significant factors, and analyses of overnight shift workers yielded reduced risk estimates. The study thus provides mixed evidence for the light-at-night hypothesis.
在长岛电磁场与乳腺癌研究中,对乳腺癌与昼夜节律紊乱之间的假设关联进行了评估。研究对象包括1996年8月至1997年6月期间确诊的576例乳腺癌女性患者以及585名以人群为基础的对照者(参与率分别为87%和83%),这些对照者年龄小于75岁,居住在纽约长岛同一住所达15年及以上。通过面对面访谈确定夜间光照暴露史,包括过去15年的轮班工作情况以及过去5年在家中的情况。采用无条件多变量逻辑回归估计比值比和95%置信区间。乳腺癌与总体轮班工作(比值比(OR)=1.04,95%置信区间(CI):0.79,1.38)或晚班工作(OR = 1.08,95% CI:0.81,1.44)均无关联。然而,通宵轮班工作的女性比从未轮班工作的女性风险更低(OR = 0.55,95% CI:0.32,0.94)。睡眠期间经常在家开灯(每周≥两次且每晚≥两次)的女性风险增加(OR = 1.65,95% CI:1.02,2.69)。后一结果提示与夜间居家光照暴露呈正相关,或者可能反映了应答偏倚。此外,总体轮班工作和晚班工作并非显著因素,对通宵轮班工作者的分析得出风险估计值降低。因此,该研究为夜间光照假说提供了混合证据。