• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用贝叶斯网络预测肝移植患者的生存率。

Using Bayesian networks to predict survival of liver transplant patients.

作者信息

Hoot Nathan, Aronsky Dominik

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:345-9.

PMID:16779059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560677/
Abstract

The relative scarcity of grafts available for liver transplantation highlights the need to identify patients likely to have good outcomes after treatment. We used transplant information from the United Network for Organ Sharing database to construct a Bayesian network model to predict 90-day graft survival. The final model incorporated a set of 29 pre-transplant variables, and it achieved performance, as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of 0.674 by cross-validation and 0.681 on an independent validation set. The results showed a positive predictive value of 91%, while the negative predictive value was lower at 30%. With additional refinement and validation, our model may be useful as an adjunct to clinical experience in identifying patients most likely to have good outcomes following liver transplantation.

摘要

可用于肝移植的移植物相对稀缺,这凸显了识别治疗后可能有良好预后患者的必要性。我们利用器官共享联合网络数据库中的移植信息构建了一个贝叶斯网络模型,以预测90天移植物存活率。最终模型纳入了一组29个移植前变量,通过交叉验证,其受试者操作特征曲线下面积衡量的性能为0.674,在独立验证集上为0.681。结果显示阳性预测值为91%,而阴性预测值较低,为30%。经过进一步完善和验证,我们的模型可能有助于临床经验,用于识别肝移植后最有可能有良好预后的患者。

相似文献

1
Using Bayesian networks to predict survival of liver transplant patients.使用贝叶斯网络预测肝移植患者的生存率。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:345-9.
2
Donor and recipient factors predicting time to graft failure following orthotopic liver transplantation: a transplant risk index.预测原位肝移植后移植物失功时间的供体和受体因素:一种移植风险指数。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2077-82. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.06.001.
3
Can a Bayesian Belief Network Be Used to Estimate 1-year Survival in Patients With Bone Sarcomas?贝叶斯信念网络能否用于估计骨肉瘤患者的1年生存率?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1681-1689. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5346-1. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
4
Development of a Bayesian Belief Network Model for personalized prognostic risk assessment in colon carcinomatosis.用于结肠癌转移个性化预后风险评估的贝叶斯信念网络模型的开发。
Am Surg. 2011 Feb;77(2):221-30.
5
A Bayesian methodology to improve prediction of early graft loss after liver transplantation derived from the liver match study.一种源自肝脏匹配研究的用于改善肝移植后早期移植物丢失预测的贝叶斯方法。
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Apr;46(4):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.11.004. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Clinical validation of an artificial neural network trained to identify acute allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients.训练用于识别肝移植受者急性同种异体移植排斥反应的人工神经网络的临床验证。
Liver Transpl. 2001 Jun;7(6):496-503. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2001.24642.
7
Validation and refinement of survival models for liver retransplantation.肝再次移植生存模型的验证与完善
Hepatology. 2003 Aug;38(2):460-9. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50328.
8
Validation of artificial neural networks as a methodology for donor-recipient matching for liver transplantation.验证人工神经网络作为肝移植供体-受者匹配方法的研究。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Feb;24(2):192-203. doi: 10.1002/lt.24870.
9
Predicting the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients Using Artificial and Bayesian Neural Networks.使用人工神经网络和贝叶斯神经网络预测胃癌患者的生存率
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Feb 26;19(2):487-490. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.487.
10
Comparing decision support methodologies for identifying asthma exacerbations.比较用于识别哮喘急性加重的决策支持方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):880-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced omics approaches in liver transplant settings: current applications and future prospectives.肝移植环境中的先进组学方法:当前应用与未来展望。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1564248. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1564248. eCollection 2025.
2
Sarcopenia and frailty: An in-depth analysis of the pathophysiology and effect on liver transplant candidates.肌肉减少症与衰弱:对病理生理学及对肝移植候选者影响的深入分析。
World J Hepatol. 2025 May 27;17(5):106182. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.106182.
3
Comparison of time-to-event machine learning models in predicting biliary complication and mortality rate in liver transplant patients.用于预测肝移植患者胆道并发症和死亡率的生存时间机器学习模型比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 8;15(1):4768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89570-4.
4
Classification-augmented survival estimation (CASE): A novel method for individualized long-term survival prediction with application to liver transplantation.分类增强生存估计(CASE):一种用于个体化长期生存预测的新方法及其在肝移植中的应用
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0315928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315928. eCollection 2025.
5
Should AI allocate livers for transplant? Public attitudes and ethical considerations.人工智能是否应该分配肝脏进行移植?公众态度和伦理考虑。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 27;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00983-0.
6
An Approach for Incorporating Context in Building Probabilistic Predictive Models.一种在构建概率预测模型时纳入上下文的方法。
Proc IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform Imaging Syst Biol. 2012 Sep;2012:96-105. doi: 10.1109/HISB.2012.30. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
7
A new Bayesian network-based risk stratification model for prediction of short-term and long-term LVAD mortality.一种基于贝叶斯网络的新型风险分层模型,用于预测短期和长期左心室辅助装置(LVAD)死亡率。
ASAIO J. 2015 May-Jun;61(3):313-23. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000209.
8
Cardiac Health Risk Stratification System (CHRiSS): a Bayesian-based decision support system for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy.心脏健康风险分层系统(CHRiSS):一种用于左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗的基于贝叶斯的决策支持系统。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 14;9(11):e111264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111264. eCollection 2014.
9
A molecular computational model improves the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules.分子计算模型提高甲状腺结节的术前诊断。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 7;12:396. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-396.
10
Development of a Bayesian model to estimate health care outcomes in the severely wounded.开发贝叶斯模型估算严重创伤患者的医疗结局。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2010 Aug 16;3:125-35. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s11537.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of donor, technical, and recipient risk factors on survival and quality of life after liver transplantation.供体、技术和受体风险因素对肝移植术后生存及生活质量的影响。
Arch Surg. 2005 Mar;140(3):273-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.3.273.
2
Is there racial disparity in outcomes after solid organ transplantation?实体器官移植后的结果存在种族差异吗?
Am J Surg. 2004 Nov;188(5):571-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.07.033.
3
Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: a disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database.美国肝移植后的生存率:对器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库的疾病特异性分析
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jul;10(7):886-97. doi: 10.1002/lt.20137.
4
Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.预测肝移植后的结局:终末期肝病模型及新推导的判别函数的效用。
Transplantation. 2004 Jan 15;77(1):99-106. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101009.91516.FC.
5
Predictive factors for early mortality following liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant. 2003 Oct;17(5):401-11. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2003.00068.x.
6
A model to predict survival at one month, one year, and five years after liver transplantation based on pretransplant clinical characteristics.一种基于移植前临床特征预测肝移植后1个月、1年和5年生存率的模型。
Liver Transpl. 2003 May;9(5):527-32. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50089.
7
Operative parameters that predict the outcomes of hepatic transplantation.预测肝移植结果的手术参数。
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Apr;196(4):566-72. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01907-5.
8
Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients.预测肝移植患者移植后生存率的移植前模型。
Ann Surg. 2002 Sep;236(3):315-22; discussion 322-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200209000-00008.
9
Recurrent neural networks for predicting outcomes after liver transplantation: representing temporal sequence of clinical observations.用于预测肝移植术后结果的循环神经网络:呈现临床观察的时间序列
Methods Inf Med. 2001;40(5):386-91.
10
Preoperative factors associated with outcome and their impact on resource use in 1148 consecutive primary liver transplants.1148例连续原发性肝移植中与预后相关的术前因素及其对资源利用的影响。
Transplantation. 2001 Sep 27;72(6):1113-22. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200109270-00023.