Palmer Andrew J, Roze Stéphane, Valentine William J, Ray Joshua A, Frei Andreas, Burnier Michel, Hess Bernhard, Spinas Giatgen A, Brändle Michael
Center for Outcomes Research (CORE), Binningen/Basel, Switzerland.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2006 May 27;136(21-22):346-52. doi: 10.57187/smw.2006.11337.
The aim of this health economic modelling study was to investigate the effect of irbesartan combined with conventional antihypertensive medications compared to conventional antihypertensive therapy alone on the progression of nephropathy in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria in a Swiss setting.
In simulated patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes, treatment of microalbuminuria with irbesartan 300 mg daily plus conventional antihypertensive medications was compared to a control regimen (conventional medications excluding angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, other angiotensin-2-receptor antagonist and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers). Progression from microalbuminuria to nephropathy, doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, and all-cause mortality was simulated over a 25-year time horizon using a published Markov model adapted to a Swiss setting. Transition probabilities were based on the Irbesartan in Reduction of Microalbuminuria-2 Study, Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial and other sources. Costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 5% annually according to Swiss guidelines, and a third party payer perspective was taken.
Treatment with irbesartan was projected to improve mean life expectancy by 0.57 years compared to conventional antihypertension treatment (undiscounted 1.22 years). Irbesartan treatment was associated with cost savings of CHF 21,488 per patient over the 25-year time horizon. Sensitivity analysis showed that irbesartan therapy remained dominant to conventional antihypertension treatment over a range of plausible assumptions.
Addition of irbesartan to conventional antihypertension therapy was projected to improve life expectancy and reduce costs in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria in a Swiss setting.
这项卫生经济模型研究的目的是,在瑞士的背景下,调查与单纯常规抗高血压治疗相比,厄贝沙坦联合常规抗高血压药物对高血压、2型糖尿病和微量白蛋白尿患者肾病进展的影响。
在模拟的高血压和2型糖尿病患者中,将每日300毫克厄贝沙坦加常规抗高血压药物治疗微量白蛋白尿与对照方案(不包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、其他血管紧张素2受体拮抗剂和二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂的常规药物)进行比较。使用一个根据瑞士情况调整的已发表的马尔可夫模型,在25年的时间范围内模拟从微量白蛋白尿进展到肾病、血清肌酐翻倍、终末期肾病和全因死亡率。转移概率基于微量白蛋白尿减少-2研究、糖尿病肾病试验中的厄贝沙坦研究以及其他资料来源。根据瑞士指南,成本和临床结果每年按5%进行贴现,并采用第三方支付者的视角。
与常规抗高血压治疗相比(未贴现时为1.22年),预计厄贝沙坦治疗可使平均预期寿命提高0.57年。在25年的时间范围内,厄贝沙坦治疗使每位患者节省成本21,488瑞士法郎。敏感性分析表明,在一系列合理假设下,厄贝沙坦治疗相对于常规抗高血压治疗仍占优势。
在瑞士的背景下,预计在常规抗高血压治疗中添加厄贝沙坦可提高2型糖尿病和微量白蛋白尿高血压患者的预期寿命并降低成本。