Coyle Douglas, Rodby Roger, Soroka Steven, Levin Adeera, Muirhead Norman, de Cotret Paul René, Chen Roland, Palmer Andrew
Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Ther. 2007 Jul;29(7):1508-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.029.
The Irbesartan in Reduction of Microalbuminuria trial and the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial found that irbesartan is renoprotective in patients having hypertension with type 2 diabetes.
The objective of this study was to assess whether treatment with irbesartan is cost-effective in Canada relative to conventional care in this patient population and whether it is more cost-effective to treat patients early rather than later in the development of renal disease from the perspective of the Canadian health and social care system.
The analysis compared 3 alternative strategies for the management of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes and early renal disease: (1) conventional hypertensive treatment excluding the use of angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRAs); (2) the early addition of irbesartan (an AIIRA) to conventional treatment; and (3) the late addition of irbesartan to conventional treatment. A Markov model was used to simulate the progression of renal disease (microalbuminuria to death) in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes over a 25-year time horizon. Transition probabilities were derived from the 2 randomized controlled trials. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted with outcome measured in life-years gained (LYGs).
The early addition of irbesartan during microalbuminuria was cost-saving and more effective than both delaying irbesartan treatment until advanced overt nephropathy (AON) (0.45 LYG, Can $54,100 saved) and conventional antihypertensive use (0.62 LYG, $68,400 saved). This was due to the increased drug costs associated with the use of irbesartan being offset by savings arising from delays in the development of overt nephropathy and the subsequent delay to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the study results.
The early use of irbesartan for patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes who have yet to develop overt nephropathy is both more effective and less costly than delaying irbesartan treatment until AON and conventional antihypertensive use. Analysis suggests that the earlier irbesartan is added to conventional antihypertensive treatment, the greater the delays in the onset of ESRD and the overall savings in health care resource utilization from the perspective of the Canadian health and social care system.
厄贝沙坦减少微量白蛋白尿试验和厄贝沙坦治疗糖尿病肾病试验发现,厄贝沙坦对患有高血压的2型糖尿病患者具有肾脏保护作用。
本研究的目的是评估在加拿大,相对于该患者群体的传统治疗,厄贝沙坦治疗是否具有成本效益,以及从加拿大卫生和社会护理系统的角度来看,在肾病发展早期而非晚期治疗患者是否更具成本效益。
该分析比较了2型糖尿病和早期肾病患者高血压管理的3种替代策略:(1)不使用血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂(AIIRAs)的传统高血压治疗;(2)在传统治疗中早期添加厄贝沙坦(一种AIIRA);(3)在传统治疗中晚期添加厄贝沙坦。使用马尔可夫模型模拟25年内2型糖尿病高血压患者肾病(微量白蛋白尿至死亡)的进展。转移概率来自两项随机对照试验。进行了成本效益分析,结果以获得的生命年数(LYGs)衡量。
在微量白蛋白尿阶段早期添加厄贝沙坦既节省成本又比两种策略更有效,这两种策略分别是将厄贝沙坦治疗推迟到晚期显性肾病(AON)(获得0.45个生命年,节省54,100加元)和传统抗高血压治疗(获得0.62个生命年,节省68,400加元)。这是因为使用厄贝沙坦增加的药物成本被显性肾病发展延迟和随后终末期肾病(ESRD)延迟所带来的节省所抵消。敏感性分析证实了研究结果的稳健性。
对于尚未发展为显性肾病的高血压2型糖尿病患者,早期使用厄贝沙坦比将厄贝沙坦治疗推迟到显性肾病阶段和传统抗高血压治疗更有效且成本更低。分析表明,从加拿大卫生和社会护理系统的角度来看,越早将厄贝沙坦添加到传统抗高血压治疗中,ESRD发病延迟越大,医疗资源利用的总体节省就越多。