Abarca Jacob, Colon Lisa R, Wang Victoria S, Malone Daniel C, Murphy John E, Armstrong Edward P
Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, P.O. Box 210202 Tucson, AZ 85721-0202, USA.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Jun;12(5):383-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.5.383.
Computerized drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening is widely used to identify potentially harmful drug combinations in the inpatient and outpatient setting.
To evaluate the performance of drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening software in identifying select clinically significant DDIs in pharmacy computer systems in community and hospital pharmacies.
Ten community pharmacies and 10 hospital pharmacies in the Tucson metropolitan area were invited to participate in the study in 2004. To test the performance of each of the systems used by the pharmacies, 25 medications were used to create 6 mock patient profiles containing 37 drug-drug pairs, 16 of which are clinically meaningful DDIs that pose a potential risk to patient safety. Each profile was entered into the computer pharmacy system, and the system response in terms of the presence or absence of a DDI alert was recorded for each drug pair. The percentage of correct responses and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each system to correctly classify each drug pair as a DDI or not was calculated. Summary statistics of these measures were calculated separately for community and hospital pharmacies.
Eight community pharmacies and 5 hospital pharmacies in the Tucson metropolitan area agreed to participate in the study. The median sensitivity and median specificity for community pharmacies was 0.88 (range, 0.81-0.94) and 0.91 (range, 0.67-1.00), respectively. For hospital pharmacies, the median sensitivity and median specificity was 0.38 (range, 0.15-0.94) and 0.95 (range, 0.81-0.95), respectively.
Based on this convenience sample of 8 community pharmacies and 5 hospital pharmacies in 1 metropolitan area, the performance of community pharmacy computer systems in screening DDIs appears to have improved over the last several years compared with research published previously in 2001. However, significant variation remains in the performance of hospital pharmacy computer systems, even among systems manufactured by the same vendor. Future research should focus on improving the performance of these systems in accurately and precisely identifying DDIs with a high probability of resulting in true potential adverse effects on clinical outcomes and creating a low .noise. ratio associated with false-positive alerts.
计算机化药物相互作用(DDI)筛查被广泛用于识别住院和门诊环境中潜在有害的药物组合。
评估药物相互作用(DDI)筛查软件在社区药房和医院药房的药学计算机系统中识别特定临床显著DDI的性能。
2004年,邀请图森市大都市区的10家社区药房和10家医院药房参与该研究。为测试各药房所使用系统的性能,使用25种药物创建6个模拟患者档案,包含37对药物组合,其中16对是对患者安全构成潜在风险的具有临床意义的DDI。将每个档案输入药学计算机系统,并记录每个药物组合的系统响应(即是否有DDI警报)。计算每个系统正确分类每个药物组合是否为DDI的正确响应百分比、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。分别计算社区药房和医院药房这些指标的汇总统计量。
图森市大都市区的8家社区药房和5家医院药房同意参与该研究。社区药房的中位灵敏度和中位特异度分别为0.88(范围0.81 - 0.94)和0.91(范围0.67 - 1.00)。医院药房的中位灵敏度和中位特异度分别为0.38(范围0.15 - 0.94)和0.95(范围0.81 - 0.95)。
基于1个大都市区8家社区药房和5家医院药房的这个便利样本,与2001年之前发表的研究相比,社区药房计算机系统在筛查DDI方面的性能在过去几年似乎有所改善。然而,医院药房计算机系统的性能仍存在显著差异,即使是同一供应商生产的系统之间也是如此。未来的研究应专注于提高这些系统在准确且精确地识别极有可能对临床结局产生真正潜在不良影响的DDI方面的性能,并降低与假阳性警报相关的“噪音”率。