[Methodological considerations in microdialysis].

Microdialysis has rapidly become popular in recent years as an in vivo technique to monitor endogenous substances in the extracellular space of the local brain region. The combination of this technique with a variety of highly sensitive detection methods has enabled us to measure in vivo release of various neurotransmitters. However, the technique involves several methodological problems. The first is that the concentrations of substances in the dialysate only partially reflect their true concentrations in the extracellular space. Therefore, neurotransmitters such as neuropeptides that are present at very low concentrations in the extracellular space are still difficult to detect. The second problem is the effects of tissue damage by the microdialysis probe. Though the probe has been miniaturized, severe disturbance in tissue metabolism cannot be neglected. Histological examination suggests that the most suitable time for commencing microdialysis is between 24 and 48 h after probe implantation. The third problem is that neurotransmitters recovered in the dialysate are sometimes not involved in neurotransmission. It is suggested that the dialysate concentration of a neurotransmitter which reflects neuronal activity should be both tetrodotoxin-sensitive and calcium-dependent. In the case of a neurotransmitter in the dialysate which does not show these characteristics, its concentration may be related to metabolic rather than neurogenic events. The fourth problem is that microdialysis has poor time resolution. Therefore, the method is not suitable for measurement of neurochemical events that rapidly change in short intervals such as milliseconds or seconds. Thus careful consideration has to be given to these problems in the actual laboratory use of microdialysis technique.