Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine the accuracy of a combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging approach (stress first-pass perfusion imaging followed by delayed-enhancement imaging) for depicting clinically significant coronary artery stenosis (> or = 70% stenosis) in patients suspected of having or known to have coronary artery disease (CAD), with coronary angiography serving as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The committee on human research approved the study protocol, and all participants gave written informed consent. This study was HIPAA compliant. Forty-seven patients (38 men and nine women; mean age, 63 years +/- 5.3 [standard deviation]) scheduled for coronary angiography were prospectively enrolled: 33 were suspected of having CAD (group A) and 14 had experienced a previous myocardial infarction and were suspected of having new lesions (group B). The MR imaging protocol included cine function, gadolinium-enhanced stress and rest first-pass perfusion MR imaging, and delayed-enhancement MR imaging. Myocardial ischemia was defined as a segment with perfusion deficit at stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and no hyperenhancement at delayed-enhancement imaging. Myocardial infarction was defined as an area with hyperenhancement at delayed-enhancement imaging.

RESULTS

One patient was excluded from analysis because of poor-quality MR images. Coronary angiography depicted significant stenosis in 30 of 46 patients (65%). In a per-vessel analysis (n = 138), stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and delayed-enhancement imaging yielded sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.89, and accuracy of 0.88, when compared with coronary angiography. The diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and delayed-enhancement imaging was slightly better than that of stress and rest first-pass perfusion MR imaging in the entire population (0.88 vs 0.85), in group A (0.86 vs 0.82), and in group B (0.93 vs 0.90).

CONCLUSION

Stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging followed by delayed-enhancement imaging is an accurate method to depict significant coronary stenosis in patients suspected of having or known to have CAD.