• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以色列和阿尔及利亚的旧石器时代中期贝壳珠子。

Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria.

作者信息

Vanhaereny Marian, d'Errico Francesco, Stringer Chris, James Sarah L, Todd Jonathan A, Mienis Henk K

机构信息

Centre for the Evolution of Cultural Diversity, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H OPY, UK. Ethnologie Préhistorique, CNRS UMR 7041, 21 Allée de l'Université, F-92023 Nanterre, France.

出版信息

Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1785-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1128139.

DOI:10.1126/science.1128139
PMID:16794076
Abstract

Perforated marine gastropod shells at the western Asian site of Skhul and the North African site of Oued Djebbana indicate the early use of beads by modern humans in these regions. The remoteness of these sites from the seashore and a comparison of the shells to natural shell assemblages indicate deliberate selection and transport by humans for symbolic use. Elemental and chemical analyses of sediment matrix adhered to one Nassarius gibbosulus from Skhul indicate that the shell bead comes from a layer containing 10 human fossils and dating to 100,000 to 135,000 years ago, about 25,000 years earlier than previous evidence for personal decoration by modern humans in South Africa.

摘要

在西亚的斯虎尔遗址和北非的瓦迪杰巴纳遗址发现的穿孔海蜗牛壳表明,现代人类在这些地区很早就开始使用珠子了。这些遗址离海岸较远,而且将这些贝壳与自然贝壳组合进行比较后发现,它们是人类特意挑选并搬运来用于象征用途的。对一枚来自斯虎尔遗址的驼背拟沼螺上附着的沉积物基质进行的元素和化学分析表明,这枚贝壳珠子来自一个含有10具人类化石的地层,年代可追溯到10万至13.5万年前,比此前南非现代人类进行个人装饰的证据早了约2.5万年。

相似文献

1
Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria.以色列和阿尔及利亚的旧石器时代中期贝壳珠子。
Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1785-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1128139.
2
82,000-year-old shell beads from North Africa and implications for the origins of modern human behavior.来自北非的82000年前的贝壳珠子及其对现代人类行为起源的启示。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):9964-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703877104. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
3
Archaeology. First jewelry? Old shell beads suggest early use of symbols.考古学。最早的珠宝?古老的贝壳珠子表明符号的早期使用。
Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1731. doi: 10.1126/science.312.5781.1731.
4
Shells and ochre in Middle Paleolithic Qafzeh Cave, Israel: indications for modern behavior.以色列旧石器时代中期卡夫泽洞穴中的贝壳与赭石:现代行为的迹象
J Hum Evol. 2009 Mar;56(3):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.10.005.
5
Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age.来自布隆伯斯洞穴的克劳氏织纹螺贝壳珠子:中石器时代象征行为的证据。
J Hum Evol. 2005 Jan;48(1):3-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.09.002. Epub 2004 Dec 21.
6
ESR dates for the hominid burial site of Es Skhul in Israel.以色列埃斯斯库尔古人类墓葬遗址的放射性碳年代测定数据。
Nature. 1989 Apr 27;338(6218):756-8. doi: 10.1038/338756a0.
7
Archaeology. Oldest beads suggest early symbolic behavior.考古学。最古老的珠子表明早期存在象征行为。
Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):369. doi: 10.1126/science.304.5669.369.
8
U-series and ESR analyses of bones and teeth relating to the human burials from Skhul.对与斯虎尔人类墓葬相关的骨骼和牙齿进行的铀系和电子自旋共振分析。
J Hum Evol. 2005 Sep;49(3):316-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.04.006.
9
Middle Stone Age shell beads from South Africa.来自南非的中石器时代贝壳珠子。
Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):404. doi: 10.1126/science.1095905.
10
Mass-spectrometric U-series dates for Israeli Neanderthal/early modern hominid sites.以色列尼安德特人/早期现代人类遗址的质谱铀系年代测定。
Nature. 1993 May 20;363(6426):252-5. doi: 10.1038/363252a0.

引用本文的文献

1
Major expansion in the human niche preceded out of Africa dispersal.人类生态位的重大扩张先于走出非洲的迁徙。
Nature. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09154-0.
2
Multivariate analyses of Aurignacian and Gravettian personal ornaments support cultural continuity in the Early Upper Palaeolithic.奥瑞纳文化期和格拉维特文化期个人装饰品的多变量分析支持了旧石器时代晚期早期的文化连续性。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 4;20(6):e0323148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323148. eCollection 2025.
3
The neural underpinnings of repeated skill transfer in human cultural evolution.
人类文化进化中重复技能转移的神经基础。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 7;16:1545120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1545120. eCollection 2025.
4
Linguistic capacity was present in the population 135 thousand years ago.13.5万年前人类就具备语言能力。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 11;16:1503900. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1503900. eCollection 2025.
5
Paleolithic eyed needles and the evolution of dress.旧石器时代的针和服装的演变。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 28;10(26):eadp2887. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp2887.
6
Making ties and social identities: Drawing connections between PPNB communities as based on shell bead typology.制作联系和社会身份:基于贝壳珠类型学,在 PPNB 社区之间建立联系。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0289091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289091. eCollection 2023.
7
The invisible plant technology of Prehistoric Southeast Asia: Indirect evidence for basket and rope making at Tabon Cave, Philippines, 39-33,000 years ago.史前东南亚的无形植物工艺:菲律宾塔邦洞 39-33000 年前的篮子和绳索制作的间接证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 30;18(6):e0281415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281415. eCollection 2023.
8
Long-distance trade in the Middle Chalcolithic of the southern Levant: The case of the olivine beads from Tel Tsaf, Jordan Valley, Israel.黎凡特南部中石器时代的远距离贸易:以以色列约但河谷泰尔察夫(Tel Tsaf)的橄榄石珠为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 10;17(8):e0271547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271547. eCollection 2022.
9
Neural correlates of perceiving and interpreting engraved prehistoric patterns as human production: Effect of archaeological expertise.作为人类生产的史前雕刻图案的感知和解释的神经关联:考古专业知识的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0271732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271732. eCollection 2022.
10
Ostrich eggshell beads from Ga-Mohana Hill North Rockshelter, southern Kalahari, and the implications for understanding social networks during Marine Isotope Stage 2.鸵鸟蛋壳珠来自卡拉哈里南部 Ga-Mohana 山北岩棚遗址,对理解海洋同位素阶段 2 期间的社交网络的启示。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268943. eCollection 2022.