Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0289091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289091. eCollection 2023.
People tend to belong to multiple social circles, which construct and reflect a person's social identity. Group affiliation is embodied and may be expressed by personal adornment. Personal adornment in general has multiple functions in human societies, among them the assimilation and transmission of different aspects of personal and collective, social and cultural identity. Beads in general, including shell beads, often constitute parcels of composite adornment, and as such are used in different configurations to portray these messages. The shared use of similar bead types by different individuals and communities indicates the mutual affiliation of the sharing parties to the same cultural circles and reflects social ties and relationships. The Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) period in the Levant is a time of pivotal changes to human lifeways necessitating profound adjustments in all aspects of life, including social relations and networks. Here we use the shell bead assemblage from the cultic-mortuary aggregation site of Kfar HaHoresh, in comparison to shell bead assemblages from multiple other sites in the Levant, as a proxy for the exploration of local and regional networks and connections between PPNB communities. Multivariate analyses of shell bead type distribution patterns across the Levant demonstrate that some types were widely shared among different communities, characterising different geographic regions, while others were rare or unique, highlighting relationships between sites and regions, which are occasionally independent of geographic proximity. Specific occurrences of shared shell bead types between Kfar HaHoresh and compared sites further illuminate the web of connections between PPNB communities in the Levant and the varying breadths of sharing-patterns reflect the hierarchical nature of the underlying social circles. Outlining these widening social affiliations sheds light on the complex structure of Neolithic social identity.
人们往往属于多个社交圈,这些社交圈构建并反映了一个人的社会身份。群体归属体现在个人的装饰上,并可能通过个人的装饰来表达。在人类社会中,个人装饰通常具有多种功能,其中包括同化和传递个人和集体、社会和文化身份的不同方面。一般来说,珠子包括贝壳珠,通常构成复合装饰的包裹,并且以不同的配置使用,以描绘这些信息。不同个人和社区共同使用类似的珠子类型表明,共享方相互隶属于同一文化圈,并反映了社会联系和关系。黎凡特地区的前新石器时代 B 期(PPNB)是人类生活方式发生重大变化的时期,需要在生活的各个方面进行深刻调整,包括社会关系和网络。在这里,我们使用来自邪教墓地聚集点 Kfar HaHoresh 的贝壳珠组合,与黎凡特地区多个其他地点的贝壳珠组合进行比较,作为探索 PPNB 社区之间本地和区域网络和联系的代理。对黎凡特地区贝壳珠类型分布模式的多元分析表明,一些类型在不同社区中广泛共享,具有不同的地理区域特征,而其他类型则很少或独特,突出了遗址之间的关系和区域,这些关系有时与地理位置无关。Kfar HaHoresh 与比较点之间共享贝壳珠类型的特定出现进一步阐明了黎凡特地区 PPNB 社区之间的联系网络,而共享模式的不同广度反映了潜在社会圈子的分层性质。概述这些不断扩大的社会关系,揭示了新石器时代社会身份的复杂结构。