• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2004年11月雷丁火车相撞事故的伤亡情况:关于改进重大事件报告及创伤评分系统应用的提议

The casualty profile from the Reading train crash, November 2004: proposals for improved major incident reporting and the application of trauma scoring systems.

作者信息

Howells N R, Dunne N, Reddy S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, Berkshire, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2006 Jul;23(7):530-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.028373.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2005.028373
PMID:16794095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2579546/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report the casualty profile of the major incident at the Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, following the Ufton Nervet Train crash, November 2004. To make further proposals regarding major incident reporting and implementation of trauma-scoring systems.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of emergency department and hospital notes. Calculation of index Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in all patients.

RESULTS

Of 61 casualties, the majority (74%) were seen in the minors area of our emergency department with a mixture of blunt impact and penetrating glass injuries. One died and 16 were admitted. 10% had an ISS >16. All surviving patients had a TRISS predicted probability of survival >90%.

CONCLUSION

We propose mandatory major incident reporting within 6 months of a major incident to aid development of a national database. As previously proposed, this will aid education and facilitate future major incident planning. We further propose the widespread use of trauma scoring systems to facilitate comparative analysis between major incidents, perhaps extrapolating this to develop a major incident score.

摘要

目的

报告2004年11月乌夫顿内维特火车相撞事故后,雷丁皇家伯克郡医院重大事件的伤亡情况。就重大事件报告及创伤评分系统的实施提出进一步建议。

方法

对急诊科和医院记录进行回顾性分析。计算所有患者的损伤严重度评分(ISS)和创伤与损伤严重度评分(TRISS)。

结果

61名伤亡人员中,大多数(74%)在我院急诊科的未成年人区域就诊,有钝器伤和穿透性玻璃伤。1人死亡,16人住院。10%的患者ISS>16。所有存活患者的TRISS预测生存率>90%。

结论

我们建议在重大事件发生后6个月内进行强制性重大事件报告,以帮助建立国家数据库。如先前提议的那样,这将有助于教育并促进未来的重大事件规划。我们还建议广泛使用创伤评分系统,以促进重大事件之间的比较分析,或许可据此开发重大事件评分。

相似文献

1
The casualty profile from the Reading train crash, November 2004: proposals for improved major incident reporting and the application of trauma scoring systems.2004年11月雷丁火车相撞事故的伤亡情况:关于改进重大事件报告及创伤评分系统应用的提议
Emerg Med J. 2006 Jul;23(7):530-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.028373.
2
Patient distribution in a mass casualty event of an airplane crash.在空难大规模伤亡事件中的患者分布情况。
Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
Israeli hospital preparedness for terrorism-related multiple casualty incidents: can the surge capacity and injury severity distribution be better predicted?以色列医院应对与恐怖主义相关的多人伤亡事件的准备情况:能否更好地预测应急能力和伤害严重程度分布?
Injury. 2009 Jul;40(7):727-31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.11.010. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
4
"Recommendations for uniform reporting of data following major trauma--the Utstein style" (as of July 17, 1999). An International Trauma Anaesthesia and Critical Care Society (ITACCS).《重大创伤后数据统一报告的建议——乌斯坦样式》(截至1999年7月17日)。国际创伤麻醉与重症监护学会(ITACCS)。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2000;51(1):18-38.
5
Rural hospital mass casualty response to a terrorist shooting spree.农村医院对恐怖分子枪击事件的大规模应急反应。
Br J Surg. 2013 Aug;100(9):1198-204. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9203.
6
Improved trauma system multicasualty incident response: comparison of two train crash disasters.改进的创伤系统多伤亡事件应对:两次火车撞车灾难的比较
J Trauma. 2010 Apr;68(4):783-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d03b8c.
7
Triage and trauma workload in mass casualty: a computer model.大规模伤亡事件中的分诊与创伤工作量:一种计算机模型
J Trauma. 2010 Nov;69(5):1074-81; discussion 1081-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e50624.
8
Independent application of the Sacco Disaster Triage Method to pediatric trauma patients.Sacco 灾难分诊法在儿科创伤患者中的独立应用。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Aug;27(4):306-11. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12000866. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
9
A comparison of "life threatening injury" concept in the Turkish Penal Code and trauma scoring systems.土耳其刑法典中“危及生命的伤害”概念与创伤评分系统的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2007 Jul;13(3):192-8.
10
Reconsidering the Resources Needed for Multiple Casualty Events: Lessons Learned From the Crash of Asiana Airlines Flight 214.重新考虑应对多伤员事件所需的资源:从韩亚航空公司 214 航班坠机事故中吸取的教训。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):512-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5107.

引用本文的文献

1
Triple train collision at Bahanaga Bazar: Disaster response and management: An observational study.巴哈纳加集市的三列火车相撞事故:灾害应对与管理:一项观察性研究。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2024 Oct-Dec;14(4):208-214. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_52_24. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Kuala Lumpur train collision during the COVID-19 pandemic.吉隆坡列车碰撞事故发生在 COVID-19 大流行期间。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00405-3.
3
Systematic reporting to improve the emergency medical response to major incidents: a pilot study.通过系统报告改善对重大事件的紧急医疗响应:一项试点研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 24;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0153-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS)-based analysis in the development of regional risk adjustment tools to trend quality in a voluntary trauma system: the experience of the Trauma Foundation of Northeast Ohio.
J Trauma. 2000 Apr;48(4):629-34; discussion 635-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00008.
2
What goes wrong at a disaster or major incident?
Hosp Med. 1998 Dec;59(12):944-6.
3
[The Trauma Registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery as a basis for interclinical quality management. A multicenter study of the German Society of Trauma Surgery].[德国创伤外科学会创伤登记作为临床间质量管理的基础。德国创伤外科学会的一项多中心研究]
Unfallchirurg. 2000 Jan;103(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s001130050005.
4
Trauma score systems: Cologne Validation Study.创伤评分系统:科隆验证研究。
J Trauma. 1997 Apr;42(4):652-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199704000-00012.
5
The casualty profile from the Manchester bombing 1996: a proposal for the construction and dissemination of casualty profiles from major incidents.1996年曼彻斯特爆炸案的伤亡情况简介:关于构建和传播重大事件伤亡情况简介的提议。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Mar;14(2):76-80. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.2.76.
6
Are British hospitals ready for the next major incident? Analysis of hospital major incident plans.英国医院是否为下一次重大事件做好准备?医院重大事件预案分析。
BMJ. 1996 Nov 16;313(7067):1242-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7067.1242.
7
Validation of trauma and injury severity score in blunt trauma patients by using a Canadian trauma registry.通过加拿大创伤登记处对钝性创伤患者的创伤和损伤严重程度评分进行验证。
J Trauma. 1996 May;40(5):733-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199605000-00008.
8
Validation of TRISS and ASCOT using a non-MTOS trauma registry.使用非MTOS创伤登记系统对TRISS和ASCOT进行验证。
J Trauma. 1995 Jan;38(1):83-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199501000-00022.
9
Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated scale.评定组织损伤的严重程度。I. 简化量表。
JAMA. 1971 Jan 11;215(2):277-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.1971.03180150059012.
10
Experience in the accident and emergency department of the Royal Victoria Hospital with patients from civil disturbances in Belfast 1969-1972, with a review of disasters in the United Kingdom 1951-1971.
Injury. 1973 Feb;4(3):189-99. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(73)90038-7.