• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉隆坡列车碰撞事故发生在 COVID-19 大流行期间。

Kuala Lumpur train collision during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, UAE.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00405-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13017-022-00405-3
PMID:35012597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8748182/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two city trains collided in an underground tunnel on 24 May 2021 at the height of COVID-19 pandemic near the Petronas Towers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, immediately after the evening rush hours. We aim to evaluate the management of this mass casualty incident highlighting the lessons learned to be used in preparedness for similar incidents that may occur in other major cities worldwide.

METHODS

Information regarding incident site and hospital management response were analysed. Data on demography, triaging, injuries and hospital management of patients were collected according to a designed protocol. Challenges, difficulties and their solutions were reported.

RESULTS

The train's emergency response team (ERT) has shut down train movements towards the incident site. Red zone (in the tunnel), yellow zone (the station platform) and green zone (outside the station entrance) were established. The fire and rescue team arrived and assisted the ERT in the red zone. Incident command system was established at the site. Medical base station was established at the yellow zone. Two hundred and fourteen passengers were in the trains. Sixty-four of them were injured. They had a median (range) ISS of 2 (1-43), and all were sent to Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL). Six (9.4%) patients were clinically triaged as red (critical), 19 (29.7%) as yellow (semi-critical) and 39 (60.9%) as green (non-critical). HKL's disaster plan was activated. All patients underwent temperature and epidemiology link assessment. Seven (10.9%) patients were admitted to the hospital (3 to the ICU, 3 to the ward and 1 to a private hospital as requested by the patient), while the rest 56 (87.5%) were discharged home. Six (9.4%) needed surgery. The COVID-19 tests were conducted on seven patients (10.9%) and were negative. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The mass casualty incident was handled properly because of a clear standard operating procedure, smooth coordination between multi-agencies and the hospitals, presence of a 'binary' system for 'COVID-risk' and 'non-COVID-risk' areas, and the modifications of the existing disaster plan. Preparedness for MCIs is essential during pandemics.

摘要

背景

2021 年 5 月 24 日,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,马来西亚吉隆坡双子塔附近的地下隧道中,两列城市列车在傍晚高峰后相撞。我们旨在评估这起重大伤亡事件的管理情况,重点介绍从中吸取的教训,以便为全球其他主要城市可能发生的类似事件做好准备。

方法

分析了事件现场和医院管理应对措施的信息。根据设计的方案收集了有关人口统计学、分诊、受伤情况和患者医院管理的数据。报告了挑战、困难及其解决方案。

结果

列车的应急响应小组(ERT)已关闭事故现场附近的列车运行。建立了红区(隧道内)、黄区(站台)和绿区(站外入口)。消防队和救援人员到达并协助ERT 在红区工作。在现场建立了事故指挥系统。在黄区建立了医疗基站。列车上有 214 名乘客。其中 64 人受伤。他们的 ISS 中位数(范围)为 2(1-43),所有人均被送往吉隆坡医院(HKL)。6 名(9.4%)患者被临床分诊为红色(危急),19 名(29.7%)为黄色(半危急),39 名(60.9%)为绿色(非危急)。HKL 的灾难计划已启动。所有患者均接受体温和流行病学链接评估。7 名(10.9%)患者住院(3 名 ICU,3 名病房,1 名按患者要求送往私立医院),其余 56 名(87.5%)出院回家。6 名(9.4%)需要手术。对 7 名(10.9%)患者进行了 COVID-19 检测,结果均为阴性。没有死亡。

结论

由于明确的标准操作程序、多机构和医院之间的顺畅协调、“COVID 风险”和“非 COVID 风险”区域的“二元”系统以及现有灾难计划的修改,这起重大伤亡事件得到了妥善处理。大流行期间必须为重大伤亡事件做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/9baede8c0597/13017_2022_405_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/43eb1f7c49cd/13017_2022_405_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/21422b83a73e/13017_2022_405_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/344ea0933442/13017_2022_405_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/82e8b5241555/13017_2022_405_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/8779fcc9639e/13017_2022_405_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/9baede8c0597/13017_2022_405_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/43eb1f7c49cd/13017_2022_405_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/21422b83a73e/13017_2022_405_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/344ea0933442/13017_2022_405_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/82e8b5241555/13017_2022_405_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/8779fcc9639e/13017_2022_405_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e5/8751263/9baede8c0597/13017_2022_405_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Kuala Lumpur train collision during the COVID-19 pandemic.吉隆坡列车碰撞事故发生在 COVID-19 大流行期间。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00405-3.
2
[Terrorist attack training exercise-What can be learned? : Baden-Württemberg counterterrorism exercise (BWTEX)].[恐怖袭击训练演习——能学到什么?:巴登-符腾堡州反恐演习(BWTEX)]
Anaesthesist. 2020 Jul;69(7):477-486. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00797-4.
3
Management of the Formosa Color Dust Explosion: Lessons Learned from the Treatment of 49 Mass Burn Casualty Patients at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.台湾彩色粉尘爆炸事件的处理:长庚纪念医院救治49名大规模烧伤伤员的经验教训
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun;137(6):1900-1908. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002148.
4
The Tsukui (Japan) Yamayuri-en Facility Stabbing Mass-Casualty Incident.日本津久井山百合园设施刺人事件
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Apr;34(2):203-208. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19000128. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Assessment of the disaster medical response system through an investigation of a 43-vehicle mass collision on Jung-ang expressway.通过对京江高速公路 43 车连环相撞事故的调查评估灾害医疗应急系统
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Disaster Response to a Mass Casualty Incident in a Hospital Fire by Regional Disaster Medical Assistance Team: Characteristics of Hospital Fire.区域性灾害医疗救援队应对医院火灾重大伤亡事件的灾难反应:医院火灾的特点。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Feb;16(1):8-11. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.164. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
7
Campaign Disaster Response - What Makes It Different.战役灾难应对——它的独特之处。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Aug 5;17:e248. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.202.
8
Managing multiple-casualty incidents: a rural medical preparedness training assessment.处理多伤员事件:农村医疗准备培训评估。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Aug;28(4):334-41. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13000423. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
9
Role of air-medical evacuation in mass-casualty incidents--a train collision experience.空中医疗后送在大规模伤亡事件中的作用——一起火车碰撞事故的经验。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):271-6. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00006920.
10
First Responder Accuracy Using SALT during Mass-casualty Incident Simulation.在大规模伤亡事件模拟中使用SALT时急救人员的准确性。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):150-4. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000091. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Triple train collision at Bahanaga Bazar: Disaster response and management: An observational study.巴哈纳加集市的三列火车相撞事故:灾害应对与管理:一项观察性研究。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2024 Oct-Dec;14(4):208-214. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_52_24. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Prehospital management of earthquake crush injuries: A collective review.地震挤压伤的院前管理:一项综合综述。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 3;23(4):199-210. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_201_23. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
3
Monkeypox: A current emergency global health threat.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a binary triage system and structural reorganization of emergency department on health care workers exposed to suspected COVID-19 patients-a single-centre analysis.二元分诊系统及急诊科结构重组对接触疑似新冠肺炎患者的医护人员的影响——单中心分析
Int J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 23;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00384-3.
2
A pandemic recap: lessons we have learned.大流行回顾:我们吸取的教训。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Sep 10;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00393-w.
3
Decision-making by medical officer in charge during major incidents: a qualitative study.
猴痘:当前全球紧急的健康威胁。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 2;23(1):5-16. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.366487. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
重大突发事件中主管医务人员的决策:一项定性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 21;29(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00937-8.
4
Disaster management of the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病疫情心理影响的灾害管理
Int J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 24;14(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00342-z.
5
The prevalence of psychological consequences of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.COVID-19 心理后果的流行率:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Health Psychol. 2022 Mar;27(4):805-824. doi: 10.1177/1359105320966639. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Novel coronavirus pandemic: A global health threat.新型冠状病毒大流行:全球健康威胁。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2020 May 27;20(2):55-62. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.285016. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
7
Covid-19 - Navigating the Uncharted.新冠疫情——探索未知领域。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1268-1269. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2002387. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
8
Mass Casualty Incident Management.大规模伤亡事件管理
Mo Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;115(5):451-455.
9
A Case Study of the High-speed Train Crash Outside Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.西班牙加利西亚自治区圣地亚哥-德孔波斯特拉市郊外高速列车相撞事件的案例研究。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):163-8. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000030. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
10
Protocol for Reports from Major Accidents and Disasters in the International Journal of Disaster Medicine.《国际灾害医学杂志》重大事故与灾难报告协议
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008 Oct;34(5):486-92. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-8806-1.