• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国护理专家标准:改善护理实践的有力工具还是益处存疑?]

[The German nursing expert standards: powerful instruments to improve nursing practice or of doubtful benefit?].

作者信息

Meyer G, Köpke S

机构信息

Universität Hamburg, MIN-Fakultät, Fachwissenschaft Gesundheit, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2006 Jun;39(3):211-6. doi: 10.1007/s00391-006-0385-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00391-006-0385-3
PMID:16794886
Abstract

The German Network for the Development of Quality in Nursing has published so-called "National Expert Standards" on selected nursing issues. These are implemented into nursing practice, used by health authorities to evaluate the quality of nursing care and also for legal judgement. Evidence-based quality criteria for practice guidelines are currently not met. The expert standards lack rigorous methods for development, transparent reporting and clarity. Implementation tools to allow structured implementation are not provided. Vague recommendations offer various possibilities of interpretation. Effectiveness of the expert standards has not yet been proven. Future nursing guidelines should take into account international quality criteria.

摘要

德国护理质量发展网络已就选定的护理问题发布了所谓的“国家专家标准”。这些标准被应用于护理实践,卫生当局用其评估护理质量,同时也用于法律判断。目前,实践指南的循证质量标准尚未得到满足。专家标准缺乏严谨的制定方法、透明的报告和清晰度。未提供允许结构化实施的实施工具。模糊的建议提供了各种解释可能性。专家标准的有效性尚未得到证实。未来的护理指南应考虑国际质量标准。

相似文献

1
[The German nursing expert standards: powerful instruments to improve nursing practice or of doubtful benefit?].[德国护理专家标准:改善护理实践的有力工具还是益处存疑?]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2006 Jun;39(3):211-6. doi: 10.1007/s00391-006-0385-3.
2
[Critical comment on nursing expert standards: meeting challenges to improve quality].
Pflege Z. 2006 Jan;59(1):34-8.
3
[Methods paper on the development of a practice guideline for the avoidance of physical restraints in nursing homes].[关于制定养老院避免使用身体约束措施实践指南的方法论文]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2008;102(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.12.003.
4
[Introduction of the National Expert Standard in nursing: possibilities, opportunities and limits in adoption].[护理领域国家专家标准介绍:采用过程中的可能性、机遇与局限]
Pflege Z. 2008 Mar;61(3):162-5.
5
The quality of care provided in nursing homes: nurses can help facilities do the right things.
Am J Nurs. 2005 May;105(5):70-2. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200505000-00032.
6
[Updating the DNQP German Network for Quality development in nursing - a methodological paper on the development, introduction and updating of expert standards in nursing].
Kinderkrankenschwester. 2016 Apr;35(4):154.
7
[Better care for persons with dementia in the nursing home: MDS releases a new guideline].[养老院中痴呆症患者的更好照护:最低数据集(MDS)发布新指南]
Pflege Z. 2009 Aug;62(8):456.
8
[Eeny, meeny miny, moe and you're out].[依尼,米尼,米尼,莫,你出局了]。
Pflege Z. 2009 Aug;62(8):449.
9
[Quality management in ambulatory care nursing and inpatient nursing in Germany. Specifics and current trends].[德国门诊护理与住院护理中的质量管理。特点与当前趋势]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Feb;54(2):185-93. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1199-4.
10
[Pressure ulcer prevalence in German nursing homes and hospitals: what role does the National Nursing Expert Standard Prevention of Pressure Ulcer play?].[德国疗养院和医院中压疮的患病率:国家护理专家压疮预防标准起到了什么作用?]
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Apr;72(4):240-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220757. Epub 2009 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
[Fall and fracture prevention based on the National Expert Standard. Implementation and costs in a real world setting in nursing homes].[基于国家专家标准的跌倒与骨折预防。养老院实际环境中的实施情况与成本]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Feb;45(2):128-37. doi: 10.1007/s00391-011-0243-9.

本文引用的文献

1
[Critical comment on nursing expert standards: meeting challenges to improve quality].
Pflege Z. 2006 Jan;59(1):34-8.
2
Cash interests taint drug advice.金钱利益玷污药物建议。
Nature. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1070-1. doi: 10.1038/4371070a.
3
Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods.制定临床指南:对当前方法的一项挑战。
BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):631-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7517.631.
4
[Criteria for evidence-based patient information].[循证患者信息的标准]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2005;99(6):343-51.
5
Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey.从医学在线数据库(Medline)检索治疗效果科学依据充分的研究的最佳检索策略:分析性调查
BMJ. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38446.498542.8F. Epub 2005 May 13.
6
Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey.从医学在线数据库检索系统评价的最佳搜索策略:分析性调查
BMJ. 2005 Jan 8;330(7482):68. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38336.804167.47. Epub 2004 Dec 24.
7
Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey.从医学在线数据库(Medline)检索科学严谨的诊断研究的最佳搜索策略:分析性调查
BMJ. 2004 May 1;328(7447):1040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38068.557998.EE. Epub 2004 Apr 8.
8
Fall prevention in residential care: a cluster, randomized, controlled trial.养老院中的跌倒预防:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):524-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52157.x.
9
CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.CONSORT声明:群组随机试验扩展版
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):702-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702.
10
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.指南传播与实施策略的有效性和效率。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Feb;8(6):iii-iv, 1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta8060.