制定临床指南：对当前方法的一项挑战。
Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods.
作者信息
Raine Rosalind, Sanderson Colin, Black Nick
机构信息
Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT.
出版信息
BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):631-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7517.631.
Abstract
Current methods for producing clinical guidelines are cumbersome and not always reliable. Could a more streamlined approach improve coverage and make decisions more transparent?
摘要
目前制定临床指南的方法繁琐且并不总是可靠。一种更简化的方法能否提高覆盖范围并使决策更加透明？
相似文献
1
Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods.制定临床指南：对当前方法的一项挑战。
BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):631-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7517.631.
2
Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.共识发展方法及其在临床指南制定中的应用。
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1-88.
3
[Application of consensus methods in making clinical practice guidelines of traditional medicine].共识方法在制定传统医学临床实践指南中的应用
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008 Jun;6(6):555-60. doi: 10.3736/jcim20080602.
4
2002 ACC/AHA guideline versus clinician judgment as diagnostic tests for chest pain.作为胸痛诊断测试的2002年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南与临床医生判断的对比
J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Mar-Apr;21(2):101-7. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070146.
5
The ADA's practice parameters.美国牙科协会的实践参数。
J Am Coll Dent. 2005 Winter;72(4):23-7.
6
Practice guidelines and the practice of medicine: is it the end of clinical judgment and expertise?实践指南与医学实践：这会是临床判断和专业技能的终结吗？
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998 Nov 28;128(48):1883-8.
7
A new method of developing expert consensus practice guidelines.制定专家共识实践指南的一种新方法。
Am J Manag Care. 1998 Jul;4(7):1023-9.
8
[Recommendations for clinical practice or consensus conferences?].[临床实践建议还是共识会议？]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1995;24(1 Suppl):1-3.
9
Delphi consensus on the feasibility of translating the ACEP clinical policies into computerized clinical decision support.德尔福共识对将 ACEP 临床政策转化为计算机临床决策支持的可行性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):317-20. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Apr 3.
10
Evaluating the quality of clinical practice guidelines.评估临床实践指南的质量。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;24(3):170-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Infographic summaries for clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing of the BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care.临床实践指南的信息图摘要：初级保健中对 BMJ 快速推荐进行用户测试的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 9;13(11):e071847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071847.
2
Perspectives on how to build bridges between regulation, health technology assessment and clinical guideline development: a qualitative focus group study with European experts.关于如何在监管、卫生技术评估和临床指南制定之间架起桥梁的观点：一项与欧洲专家进行的定性焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 28;13(8):e072309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072309.
3
Existing guidance on reporting of consensus methodology: a systematic review to inform ACCORD guideline development.现有共识方法报告指南：为 ACCORD 指南制定提供信息的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e065154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065154.
4
Using consensus methods to prioritize modifiable risk factors for development of manifestations of frailty in hospitalized older adults.采用共识方法来确定可改变的风险因素，以优先考虑住院老年患者虚弱表现的发展。
Nurs Open. 2023 Feb;10(2):1016-1028. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1370. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
5
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol.ACCORD生物医学研究和临床实践中基于共识方法报告指南：一项研究方案。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022 Jun 7;7(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0.
6
Maintaining Clinical Freedom Whilst Achieving Value in Biologics Prescribing: An Integrated Cross-Specialty Consensus of UK Dermatologists, Rheumatologists and Gastroenterologists.在实现生物制剂处方价值的同时保持临床自由：英国皮肤科医生、风湿病学家和胃肠病学家的综合跨专业共识。
BioDrugs. 2021 Mar;35(2):187-199. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00464-5. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Evaluation of evidence grades in psychiatry and psychotherapy guidelines.精神科和心理治疗指南中证据等级的评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02897-2.
8
Assessing the process and outcome of the development of practice guidelines and recommendations: PANELVIEW instrument development.评估实践指南和建议制定的过程和结果：PANELVIEW 工具的开发。
CMAJ. 2020 Oct 5;192(40):E1138-E1145. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200193.
9
Evaluating the Impact of the Grading and Assessment of Predictive Tools Framework on Clinicians and Health Care Professionals' Decisions in Selecting Clinical Predictive Tools: Randomized Controlled Trial.评估分级和评估预测工具框架对临床医生和医疗保健专业人员在选择临床预测工具时决策的影响：随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 9;22(7):e15770. doi: 10.2196/15770.
10
Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations.抑郁症的药物治疗：比较临床实践指南推荐的系统评价
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 21;15(4):e0231700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231700. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
NICE work--providing guidance to the British National Health Service.干得漂亮——为英国国家医疗服务体系提供指导。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1383-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048221.
2
An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development.临床指南制定中群体判断决定因素的实验研究
Lancet. 2004;364(9432):429-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16766-4.
3
Beyond the evidence in clinical guidelines.超越临床指南中的证据。
Lancet. 2004;364(9432):392-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16778-0.
4
National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.国家临床优化研究所及其价值判断。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224.
5
The appropriateness method.适当性方法。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):228-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04264212.
6
Influence of clinical and economical factors on the expert rating of appropriateness of preoperative use of recombinant erythropoietin in elective orthopedic surgery patients.临床和经济因素对择期骨科手术患者术前使用重组促红细胞生成素适宜性专家评分的影响
Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):122-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04263153.
7
Effect of specialty and nationality on panel judgments of the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: a pilot study.专业和国籍对冠状动脉血运重建适宜性专家小组判断的影响：一项试点研究。
Med Care. 2001 May;39(5):513-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200105000-00011.
8
Do clinical practice guidelines reflect research evidence?临床实践指南是否反映了研究证据？
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Apr;5(2):76-82. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500204.
9
Effect of panel composition on physician ratings of appropriateness of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: elucidating differences between multispecialty panel results and specialty society recommendations.专家小组构成对医生对腹主动脉瘤手术适宜性评分的影响：阐明多专业专家小组结果与专业学会建议之间的差异。
Health Policy. 1997 Oct;42(1):67-81. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00055-9.
10
Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.临床指南：临床指南的潜在益处、局限性及危害
BMJ. 1999 Feb 20;318(7182):527-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527.
Zotero 插件