University of Mississippi.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Summer;4(2):113-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-113.
Head Start children were matched into two groups on the basis of rates of disruptive behavior during rest periods. Attempts were made to modify their behavior using either individual or group token reinforcement procedures. While the reinforcement procedures reduced inappropriate behavior somewhat, the addition of instructions to the reinforcement reduced the inappropriate behavior to near zero for both groups. Instructions alone, however, were ineffective in controlling behavior. Type of reinforcement (group or individual) did not produce differential effects. While experimental control over the target behavior was demonstrated, there was little carryover from the experimental room to the regular classroom. Even when treatment was introduced into the regular class, follow-up results showed that with time the target behavior approximated pretreatment levels. The results suggest that (a) the combination of instructions and reinforcement is much more effective than either one of these alone, (b) behavior change is specific to the environmental contingencies, and (c) the group reinforcement technique, which is much more easily implemented, was at least as effective as individual reinforcement in the present study.
起点计划的儿童根据休息期间破坏性行为的发生率被分为两组。尝试使用个体或小组代币强化程序来改变他们的行为。虽然强化程序在一定程度上减少了不当行为,但在强化程序中添加指令后,两组的不当行为都减少到接近于零。然而,仅仅指令本身在控制行为方面是无效的。强化类型(小组或个体)并没有产生不同的效果。虽然对目标行为进行了实验控制,但从实验室到常规教室的效果很少。即使在常规课堂上引入了治疗,后续结果表明,随着时间的推移,目标行为接近了治疗前的水平。结果表明:(a) 指令和强化的结合比单独使用任何一种都更有效,(b) 行为变化是特定于环境条件的,以及 (c) 在本研究中,小组强化技术,即更容易实施的技术,与个体强化一样有效。