Baer R, Ascione F, Casto G
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1977;5(2):135-45. doi: 10.1007/BF00913089.
Numerous studies have demonstrated that disruptive classroom behavior can be decreased by delivering tokens contingent upon periods of time during which children do not engage in it or by removing tokens contingent upon its occurrence. To date, the best controlled of these studies have consistently reported the two procedures to be qually effective. However, in these studies, token the two procedures to be equally effective. However, in these studies, token contingencies have been combined with instructions regarding the contigencies. The present study compared these two procedures when no instructions were given regarding the token contingencies. Token delivery was not effective in decreasing disruptive behavior in any of the children, while a combination of token delivery and removal was effective for three of four children. The results token delivery and removal was effective for three of four children. The results suggest that the combined procedure may be effective with certain populations that are not readily controlled by instructions.
大量研究表明,通过在儿童未出现破坏性行为的时间段给予代币,或者在破坏性行为发生时扣除代币,可以减少课堂上的破坏性行为。迄今为止,这些研究中控制得最好的一直报告这两种方法同样有效。然而,在这些研究中,代币法与关于意外情况的说明相结合。本研究在未给出关于代币意外情况的说明时,对这两种方法进行了比较。给予代币对任何儿童的破坏性行为减少均无效,而给予和扣除代币相结合的方法对四个儿童中的三个有效。结果表明,对于某些不易受说明控制的人群,联合使用这两种方法可能有效。