Mount Saint Vincent University.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):377-87. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-377.
The effects of two different procedures for reducing elevator energy use were assessed using a multiple-baseline design. In the first procedure, feedback about the amount of energy consumed by the elevators each week was posted on each elevator door. Later, signs advocating the use of stairs to save energy and improve health were posted next to the feedback signs. In the second procedure, the time required to travel between floors was increased by adding a delay to the elevator door closing mechanisms. Results indicated that neither feedback alone nor feedback plus educational signs reduced the amount of energy consumed by the elevators. However, use of the door delay reduced consumption by one-third in all elevators.A second experiment replicated the effect of the door delay on energy consumption and, in addition, demonstrated that the door delay also produced a reduction in the number of persons using the elevator. The second experiment also showed that, following an initial period during which a full delay was in effect, a gradual reduction of the delay interval resulted in continued energy conservation. Reduced convenience as a general strategy for energy conservation is discussed.
采用多基线设计评估了两种不同的减少电梯能耗的程序的效果。在第一种程序中,每周在每个电梯门上张贴有关电梯能耗的反馈信息。后来,在反馈标志旁边张贴了提倡使用楼梯以节省能源和改善健康的标志。在第二种程序中,通过增加电梯门关闭机构的延迟来增加楼层之间的旅行时间。结果表明,仅反馈或反馈加教育标志都不能减少电梯的能耗。但是,使用门延迟将所有电梯的能耗降低了三分之一。第二项实验复制了门延迟对能耗的影响,并且还表明门延迟还减少了使用电梯的人数。第二项实验还表明,在完全延迟生效的初始阶段之后,逐渐减少延迟间隔会导致持续的节能。讨论了将减少便利性作为节能的一般策略。