Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Spring;17(1):3-21. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-3.
A popular program among consumer action groups involves publicizing comparative food price information (CFPI) gathered from retail stores. Its significance is based on the assumption that publishing CFPI maximizes retail competition (i.e., moderates price levels or price increases) and occasions more frugal store selections among consumers. We tested these assumptions during a 2-year analysis. Specifically, we monitored the prices of two distinct market baskets in the supermarkets of two midwestern cities (target and contrast cities). Following a lengthy baseline, we published the prices of only one of the market baskets at stores in the target city in the local newspaper on five different occasions. The results suggested that reductions in price inflation occurred for both market baskets at the independently operated target stores. The corporate chain stores were not similarly affected. In addition, surveys indicated that many consumers used the CFPI as a basis for store selection. Finally, the analysis included a discussion of the politics, economics, and future of CFPI programs.
消费者行动团体中一项受欢迎的计划涉及宣传从零售店收集的比较食品价格信息(CFPI)。其意义基于这样一种假设,即发布 CFPI 可以最大限度地提高零售竞争(即调节价格水平或价格上涨),并促使消费者更节俭地选择商店。我们在为期两年的分析中检验了这些假设。具体来说,我们监测了两个中西部城市(目标城市和对比城市)的超市中两个不同的市场篮子的价格。在一个漫长的基线之后,我们在当地报纸上仅在目标城市的商店中发布了其中一个市场篮子的五次不同价格。结果表明,独立经营的目标商店的两个市场篮子的价格通胀都有所下降。而连锁公司的商店则没有受到类似的影响。此外,调查表明,许多消费者将 CFPI 用作商店选择的基础。最后,分析还讨论了 CFPI 计划的政治、经济和未来。