Liang Kae-Woei, Sheu Wayne Huey-Herng, Lee Wen-Lieng, Liu Tsun-Jui, Ting Chih-Tai, Chen Ying-Tsung, Lee Wen-Jane
Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Jun;22(8):691-6. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70938-2.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of death worldwide. Epidemiological studies have documented conventional risk factors; however, no studies to date have addressed the roles of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and there have been few reports on other novel risk factors in CAD progression. The aim of the present study was to explore the roles of novel and conventional risk factors in CAD progression.
Patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent repeat coronary angiograms and had serum samples at the time of their first catheterization between March 1999 and January 2004 were enrolled. Those who had progression of coronary atherosclerosis were classified into the progression group (n = 66). Those who did not have CAD progression were classified into the nonprogression group (n = 124).
There were more cases of diabetes mellitus (36% versus 20%; P = 0.024) and more men (92% versus 81%; P = 0.040) in the CAD progression group than in the nonprogression group, respectively. The progression group also had poorer lipid profiles than the nonprogression group, including higher total cholesterol (188+/-42 mg/dL versus 173+/-39 mg/dL, respectively; P = 0.014) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (122+/-38 mg/dL versus 112+/-36 mg/dL, respectively; P = 0.025). In terms of inflammatory markers, progression patients had higher baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentrations (P = 0.018), which was also related to the subsequent angiographic severity score changes; however, sCD40L (6182+/-4352 pg/mL versus 6244+/-4602 pg/mL; P = 0.961), MCP-1 (427+/-540 pg/mL versus 341+/-128 pg/mL; P = 0.580) and adhesion molecules concentrations were indifferent between the progression group and the nonprogression group, respectively. Using a multivariate logistical regression model, the ORs for predicting progression were 2.19 for diabetes mellitus, 2.04 for hypercholesterolemia and 1.52 for hs-CRP (P < 0.05).
In the present study, only conventional risk factors, and particularly hs-CRP, were markers for predicting CAD progression. Novel risk factors, such as concentrations of sCD40L, MCP-1 and adhesion molecules, did not play significant roles.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是全球主要的死亡原因。流行病学研究记录了传统的危险因素;然而,迄今为止尚无研究探讨可溶性CD40配体(sCD40L)和单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)的作用,关于CAD进展中其他新危险因素的报道也很少。本研究的目的是探讨新的和传统的危险因素在CAD进展中的作用。
纳入1999年3月至2004年1月期间接受重复冠状动脉造影且在首次导管插入术时采集了血清样本的稳定型心绞痛患者。冠状动脉粥样硬化进展的患者被分为进展组(n = 66)。未发生CAD进展的患者被分为非进展组(n = 124)。
CAD进展组的糖尿病病例数(36% 对20%;P = 0.024)和男性比例(92% 对81%;P = 0.040)均高于非进展组。进展组的血脂谱也比非进展组差,包括总胆固醇水平更高(分别为188±42 mg/dL对173±39 mg/dL;P = 0.014)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平更高(分别为122±38 mg/dL对112±36 mg/dL;P = 0.025)。在炎症标志物方面,进展组患者的基线高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)浓度更高(P = 0.018),这也与随后的血管造影严重程度评分变化相关;然而,进展组和非进展组之间的sCD40L(6182±4352 pg/mL对6244±4602 pg/mL;P = 0.961)、MCP-1(427±540 pg/mL对341±128 pg/mL;P = 0.580)和黏附分子浓度并无差异。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,预测进展的比值比(OR)分别为:糖尿病2.19、高胆固醇血症2.04和hs-CRP 1.52(P < 0.05)。
在本研究中,只有传统危险因素,尤其是hs-CRP,是预测CAD进展的标志物。新的危险因素,如sCD40L、MCP-1和黏附分子的浓度,未发挥显著作用。