Matthews Gerald, Emo Amanda K, Funke Gregory, Zeidner Moshe, Roberts Richard D, Costa Paul T, Schulze Ralf
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2006 Jun;12(2):96-107. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.2.96.
Emotional intelligence (EI) may predict stress responses and coping strategies in a variety of applied settings. This study compares EI and the personality factors of the Five Factor Model (FFM) as predictors of task-induced stress responses. Participants (N = 200) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 task conditions, 3 of which were designed to be stressful. Results confirmed that low EI was related to worry states and avoidance coping, even with the FFM statistically controlled. However, EI was not specifically related to task-induced changes in stress state. Results also confirmed that Neuroticism related to distress, worry, and emotion-focused coping, and Conscientiousness predicted use of task-focused coping. The applied utility of EI and personality measures is discussed.
情商（EI）可能在各种应用场景中预测应激反应和应对策略。本研究比较了情商和五因素模型（FFM）中的人格因素作为任务诱发应激反应的预测指标。参与者（N = 200）被随机分配到4种任务条件中的1种，其中3种被设计为有压力的。结果证实，即使在对FFM进行统计学控制的情况下，低情商也与担忧状态和回避应对有关。然而，情商与任务诱发的压力状态变化并无特定关联。结果还证实，神经质与痛苦、担忧以及以情绪为中心的应对方式有关，而尽责性则预测了以任务为中心的应对方式的使用。本文讨论了情商和人格测量的应用效用。
