Gurbet Alp, Basagan-Mogol Elif, Turker Gurkan, Ugun Fatih, Kaya F Nur, Ozcan Berin
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Can J Anaesth. 2006 Jul;53(7):646-52. doi: 10.1007/BF03021622.
This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to assess whether intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine provides effective postoperative analgesia. Postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption were compared in a treated group and a placebo group, both of which received patient-controlled morphine after total abdominal hysterectomy.
Fifty women were randomly assigned to two groups. Group D (n = 25) received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 mug.kg(-1) iv during induction of anesthesia, followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5 mug.kg(-1).hr(-1) throughout the operation. Group P (n = 25) received a volume-matched bolus and infusion of placebo (0.9% saline). For each case, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were recorded intraoperatively and for 48 hr postoperatively. Patients used a patient-controlled analgesia device to receive bolus doses of morphine after surgery. Total morphine consumption, pain scores, and sedation scores were recorded for the first 48 hr (two hours in the postanesthesia care unit and 46 hr on the ward).
The groups were similar with respect to mean times to extubation of the trachea. Pain and sedation scores were also similar between groups at all corresponding times throughout the 48-hr period of observation. Group D patients consumed significantly less morphine in the postanesthesia care unit and on the ward (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Fewer patients in Group D experienced itching or nausea/vomiting (P < 0.05).
Continuous iv dexmedetomidine during abdominal surgery provides effective postoperative analgesia, and reduces postoperative morphine requirements without increasing the incidence of side effects.
本前瞻性、随机、双盲研究旨在评估术中输注右美托咪定是否能提供有效的术后镇痛。比较治疗组和安慰剂组的术后疼痛评分及吗啡用量,两组均在全腹子宫切除术后接受患者自控吗啡镇痛。
50名女性被随机分为两组。D组(n = 25)在麻醉诱导期间静脉注射负荷剂量的右美托咪定1 μg·kg⁻¹,随后在整个手术过程中以0.5 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹的速率持续输注。P组(n = 25)接受等容量的安慰剂推注和输注(0.9%生理盐水)。对于每例患者,术中及术后48小时记录心率、外周血氧饱和度、收缩压和舒张压。患者术后使用患者自控镇痛装置接受吗啡推注剂量。记录前48小时(麻醉后护理单元2小时和病房46小时)的吗啡总用量、疼痛评分和镇静评分。
两组气管拔管平均时间相似。在48小时观察期内的所有相应时间,两组间的疼痛和镇静评分也相似。D组患者在麻醉后护理单元和病房的吗啡用量显著较少(分别为P < 0.05和P < 0.01)。D组出现瘙痒或恶心/呕吐的患者较少(P < 0.05)。
腹部手术期间持续静脉输注右美托咪定可提供有效的术后镇痛,并减少术后吗啡需求量,且不增加副作用发生率。