Leff H Stephen, Conley Jeremy A
Department of Psychiatry at Cambridge Health Alliance, Human Services Research Institute and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Nov;33(6):648-58. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0057-z.
In this paper we describe three approaches to assessing evidence for stakeholders interested in evidence-based practices: narrative reviews, systematic reviews (including meta-analyses), and registries. We then compare the approaches in terms of the degree to which they posses desired attributes of evidence assessments. Our review suggests that hybrid approaches that combined the best features of all three should be pursued to further the use of evidence-based practices, and that such hybrids are possible given the capacity of the World Wide Web. We conclude by stressing the need for empirical research on evidence assessments.
在本文中,我们描述了三种为对循证实践感兴趣的利益相关者评估证据的方法:叙述性综述、系统综述(包括荟萃分析)和注册登记。然后,我们根据这些方法具备证据评估所需属性的程度对它们进行比较。我们的综述表明,应采用结合了这三种方法最佳特征的混合方法,以促进循证实践的应用,并且鉴于万维网的能力,这种混合方法是可行的。我们在结尾强调了对证据评估进行实证研究的必要性。