Schnorrer Petra, Behrens Georg M N, Wilson Nicholas S, Pooley Joanne L, Smith Christopher M, El-Sukkari Dima, Davey Gayle, Kupresanin Fiona, Li Ming, Maraskovsky Eugene, Belz Gabrielle T, Carbone Francis R, Shortman Ken, Heath William R, Villadangos Jose A
Immunology Division and Cooperative Research Centre for Vaccine Technology, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 11;103(28):10729-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601956103. Epub 2006 Jun 28.
Mouse spleens contain three populations of conventional (CD11c(high)) dendritic cells (DCs) that play distinct functions. The CD8(+) DC are unique in that they can present exogenous antigens on their MHC class I molecules, a process known as cross-presentation. It is unclear whether this special ability is because only the CD8(+) DC can capture the antigens used in cross-presentation assays, or because this is the only DC population that possesses specialized machinery for cross-presentation. To solve this important question we examined the splenic DC subsets for their ability to both present via MHC class II molecules and cross-present via MHC class I using four different forms of the model antigen ovalbumin (OVA). These forms include a cell-associated form, a soluble form, OVA expressed in bacteria, or OVA bound to latex beads. With the exception of bacterial antigen, which was poorly cross-presented by all DC, all antigenic forms were cross-presented much more efficiently by the CD8(+) DC. This pattern could not be attributed simply to a difference in antigen capture because all DC subsets presented the antigen via MHC class II. Indeed, direct assessments of endocytosis showed that CD8(+) and CD8(-) DC captured comparable amounts of soluble and bead-associated antigen, yet only the CD8(+) DC cross-presented these antigenic forms. Our results indicate that cross-presentation requires specialized machinery that is expressed by CD8(+) DC but largely absent from CD8(-) DC. This conclusion has important implications for the design of vaccination strategies based on antigen targeting to DC.
小鼠脾脏含有三类具有不同功能的传统(CD11c(高))树突状细胞(DC)。CD8(+) DC的独特之处在于它们能够在其MHC I类分子上呈递外源性抗原,这一过程称为交叉呈递。目前尚不清楚这种特殊能力是因为只有CD8(+) DC能够捕获交叉呈递试验中使用的抗原,还是因为这是唯一拥有用于交叉呈递的特殊机制的DC群体。为了解决这个重要问题,我们使用四种不同形式的模型抗原卵清蛋白(OVA),检测了脾脏DC亚群通过MHC II类分子呈递和通过MHC I类分子交叉呈递的能力。这些形式包括细胞相关形式、可溶性形式、在细菌中表达的OVA或与乳胶珠结合的OVA。除了所有DC交叉呈递能力较差的细菌抗原外,所有抗原形式在CD8(+) DC中的交叉呈递效率都要高得多。这种模式不能简单地归因于抗原捕获的差异,因为所有DC亚群都通过MHC II类分子呈递抗原。事实上,对内吞作用的直接评估表明,CD8(+)和CD8(-) DC捕获的可溶性和与珠子相关的抗原量相当,但只有CD8(+) DC交叉呈递这些抗原形式。我们的结果表明,交叉呈递需要CD8(+) DC表达但CD8(-) DC基本不存在的特殊机制。这一结论对基于抗原靶向DC的疫苗接种策略设计具有重要意义。