• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测死亡方面的社会经济差异：比较个人层面的教育程度和基于地区的社会经济指标。

Monitoring socioeconomic disparities in death: comparing individual-level education and area-based socioeconomic measures.

作者信息

Rehkopf David H, Haughton Lorna T, Chen Jarvis T, Waterman Pamela D, Subramanian S V, Krieger Nancy

机构信息

Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass 02115, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2006 Dec;96(12):2135-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075408. Epub 2006 Jun 29.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2005.075408
PMID:16809582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1698171/
Abstract

We compared all-cause mortality rates stratified by individual-level education and by census tract area-based socioeconomic measures for Massachusetts (1999-2001). Among persons aged 25 and older, the age-adjusted relative index of inequality was slightly higher for the census tract than for the individual education measures (1.5 vs 1.2, respectively). Only the census tract socioeconomic measures could provide a relative index of inequality (2-3) for deaths before age 25 or detect expected socioeconomic disparities for deaths among persons 65 and older (relative index of inequality= approximately 1.2 vs 0.8 for census tract measures and individual education, respectively).

摘要

我们比较了马萨诸塞州（1999 - 2001年）按个人层面教育程度以及基于人口普查区的社会经济指标分层的全因死亡率。在25岁及以上人群中，人口普查区的年龄调整不平等相对指数略高于个人教育程度指标（分别为1.5和1.2）。只有人口普查区的社会经济指标能够提供25岁之前死亡的不平等相对指数（2 - 3），或者发现65岁及以上人群死亡中预期的社会经济差异（人口普查区指标和个人教育程度的不平等相对指数分别约为1.2和0.8）。

相似文献

1
Monitoring socioeconomic disparities in death: comparing individual-level education and area-based socioeconomic measures.监测死亡方面的社会经济差异：比较个人层面的教育程度和基于地区的社会经济指标。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Dec;96(12):2135-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075408. Epub 2006 Jun 29.
2
Comparing individual- and area-based socioeconomic measures for the surveillance of health disparities: A multilevel analysis of Massachusetts births, 1989-1991.比较基于个体和区域的社会经济指标以监测健康差异：对1989 - 1991年马萨诸塞州出生情况的多层次分析
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Nov 1;164(9):823-34. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj313. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
3
[An index of socioeconomic position based on 2001 Census, Rome].[基于2001年罗马人口普查的社会经济地位指数]
Epidemiol Prev. 2006 Nov-Dec;30(6):352-7.
4
Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US).选择基于区域的社会经济指标来监测低出生体重和儿童铅中毒方面的社会不平等现象：公共卫生差异地理编码项目（美国）
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Mar;57(3):186-99. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.3.186.
5
Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project (US).监测性传播感染、结核病和暴力方面的社会经济不平等：地理编码与基于地区的社会经济衡量指标选择——公共卫生差异地理编码项目（美国）
Public Health Rep. 2003 May-Jun;118(3):240-60. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.3.240.
6
Economic deprivation and AIDS incidence in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州的经济贫困与艾滋病发病率
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jul;90(7):1064-73. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.7.1064.
7
Widening socioeconomic disparities in US childhood mortality, 1969 2000.1969 - 2000年美国儿童死亡率方面不断扩大的社会经济差距。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Sep;97(9):1658-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.087320. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
8
Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.美国死亡率和癌症发病率的社会经济不平等的地理编码与监测：基于区域的测量方法和地理层级的选择是否重要？：公共卫生差异地理编码项目
Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Sep 1;156(5):471-82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf068.
9
Local Residential Segregation Matters: Stronger Association of Census Tract Compared to Conventional City-Level Measures with Fatal and Non-Fatal Assaults (Total and Firearm Related), Using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) for Racial, Economic, and Racialized Economic Segregation, Massachusetts (US), 1995-2010.本地居住隔离很重要：与传统城市层面的指标相比，使用极端集中度指数（ICE）衡量种族、经济和种族化经济隔离时，普查区与致命和非致命袭击（包括总数及与枪支相关的袭击）之间的关联更强，美国马萨诸塞州，1995 - 2010年
J Urban Health. 2017 Apr;94(2):244-258. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0116-z.
10
[Changing social disparities and mortality in France (1968-1996): cause of death analysis by educational level].[法国社会不平等与死亡率的变化（1968 - 1996年）：按教育水平进行的死因分析]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Apr;55(2):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2006.10.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a predictive calculator for optimal glycemic control and time-in-tight-range following CGM sensor placement in type 1 diabetes and pancreatic diabetes: a prospective study.1型糖尿病和胰腺性糖尿病患者在连续血糖监测（CGM）传感器置入后用于优化血糖控制和血糖处于目标范围内时间的预测计算器的验证：一项前瞻性研究。
Endocrine. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s12020-025-04385-7.
2
Does inclusion of neighborhood variables improve clinical risk prediction for advanced prostate cancer in Black and White men?纳入邻里变量是否能改善黑人和白人男性晚期前列腺癌的临床风险预测？
Urol Oncol. 2025 May;43(5):334.e17-334.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.021. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
3
The integration of health equity into policy to reduce disparities: Lessons from California during the COVID-19 pandemic.将健康公平纳入政策以减少差距：新冠疫情期间加利福尼亚州的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 6;20(3):e0316517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316517. eCollection 2025.
4
Influence of smoking on glycaemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes using flash glucose monitoring and its mediating role in the relationship between socioeconomic status and glycaemic control.吸烟对使用动态葡萄糖监测的1型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响及其在社会经济地位与血糖控制关系中的中介作用。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024 Dec 16;24(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01535-y. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Structural inequality and temporal brain dynamics across diverse samples.结构不平等与不同样本中的时间大脑动力学。
Clin Transl Med. 2024 Oct;14(10):e70032. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70032.
6
Prevalence and risk factors of hearing loss in the Chinese population aged 45 years and older: Findings from the CHARLS baseline survey.中国 45 岁及以上人群听力损失的患病率及相关危险因素：CHARLS 基线调查结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 23;19(9):e0310953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310953. eCollection 2024.
7
Health and disability - a multi-group latent class analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among those with mental and physical health conditions.健康与残疾 - 基于世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0 的多群组潜类分析，研究对象为同时存在心理健康和身体心理健康状况的人群。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 27;22(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02273-8.
8
A research agenda for understanding how social inequality is linked to brain structure and function.一项关于理解社会不平等如何与大脑结构和功能相联系的研究议程。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jan;8(1):20-31. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01774-8. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
9
The Impact of Neighborhood Deprivation on the Survival Rates of Patients with Cancer in Korea.邻里贫困对韩国癌症患者生存率的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 15;11(24):3171. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243171.
10
Association Between Social Disadvantage and Otitis Media Treatment in US Children With Commercial Insurance.美国商业保险儿童中社会劣势与中耳炎治疗之间的关联
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Nov 10;149(1):7-14. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3560.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing individual- and area-based socioeconomic measures for the surveillance of health disparities: A multilevel analysis of Massachusetts births, 1989-1991.比较基于个体和区域的社会经济指标以监测健康差异：对1989 - 1991年马萨诸塞州出生情况的多层次分析
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Nov 1;164(9):823-34. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj313. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
2
Methodological issues in measuring health disparities.衡量健康差异中的方法学问题。
Vital Health Stat 2. 2005 Jul(141):1-16.
3
Racial disparities in context: a multilevel analysis of neighborhood variations in poverty and excess mortality among black populations in Massachusetts.背景下的种族差异：对马萨诸塞州黑人人口贫困和超额死亡率的邻里差异进行多层次分析。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Feb;95(2):260-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.034132.
4
Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975-2000.1975 - 2000年美国宫颈癌发病率、死亡率、分期及生存率方面持续存在的地区社会经济差异。
Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20467.
5
Socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer: distinguishing individual- and community-level effects.乳腺癌的社会经济风险因素：区分个体和社区层面的影响。
Epidemiology. 2004 Jul;15(4):442-50. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000129512.61698.03.
6
Individual- and area-level socioeconomic status variables as predictors of mortality in a cohort of 179,383 persons.个体及区域层面的社会经济地位变量作为179383人群队列中死亡率的预测因素
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun 1;159(11):1047-56. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh129.
7
The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects.多级统计方法在识别因果邻里效应方面的相关性。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):1961-7. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00415-5.
8
Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project.种族/族裔、性别与健康状况的社会经济梯度监测：基于区域的社会经济指标比较——公共卫生差异地理编码项目
Am J Public Health. 2003 Oct;93(10):1655-71. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.10.1655.
9
Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.美国死亡率和癌症发病率的社会经济不平等的地理编码与监测：基于区域的测量方法和地理层级的选择是否重要？：公共卫生差异地理编码项目
Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Sep 1;156(5):471-82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf068.
10
Social class inequality in mortality from 1921 to 1972 in England and Wales.1921年至1972年英格兰和威尔士社会阶层在死亡率方面的不平等。
Popul Stud (Camb). 1985 Mar;39(1):17-31. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000141256.