Qian Z Jason, Rehkopf David H
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Nov 10;149(1):7-14. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3560.
It is well established that social disadvantage is associated with earlier, more frequent, and more severe otitis media in children. Appropriate medical and surgical treatment of otitis media can prevent hearing loss and other complications, which may affect future academic and employment opportunities in socially disadvantaged populations. Clinical treatment patterns for otitis media in the US are unclear.
To describe and quantify social disparities in the treatment patterns of otitis media in children in the US.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study included claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Database between January 1, 2003, and March 31, 2021, with linked inpatient, outpatient, and pharmaceutical claims for 4 831 408 children with otitis media.
Age at first otitis media diagnosis, sex, environmental allergies, gastroesophageal reflux, adenotonsillar hyperplasia, zip code, social deprivation index score, social vulnerability index score.
Treatment of recurrent and suppurative otitis media in children, insertion of tympanostomy tubes, and treatment for severe complications of undertreated otitis media. The principal measure of social disadvantage was the social deprivation index. The social vulnerability index was used for sensitivity analyses to ensure external validity. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to quantify the association of all projected variables with the study outcomes.
Among 4 831 408 US children with otitis media (median [IQR] age, 4 [1-8] years; 2 491 557 boys [51.57%]), 994 921 (20.59%) were treated for recurrent otitis media, 717 978 (14.86%) were treated for suppurative otitis media, 335 949 (6.95%) received tympanostomy tubes, and 10 975 (0.23%) had severe complications of otitis media. In multivariable regression models including patient factors and social indices, earlier age at diagnosis, male sex, environmental allergies, gastroesophageal reflux, and adenotonsillar hyperplasia were associated with increased treatment for otitis media, whereas social deprivation index was associated with lower odds of medical treatment for recurrent otitis media (odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.87), suppurative otitis media (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.60-0.62), and insertion of tympanostomy tubes (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.78) but higher odds of having severe complications (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19-1.37).
The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that children with otitis media who were socially disadvantaged were less likely to receive treatment and more likely to experience complications for undertreated otitis media. As otitis media is a modifiable risk factor for hearing loss, efforts need to be made to ensure equitable access to treatment for all children.
社会劣势与儿童中耳炎发病更早、更频繁且病情更严重有关,这一点已得到充分证实。中耳炎的适当药物和手术治疗可预防听力损失及其他并发症,而这些并发症可能会影响社会弱势群体未来的学业和就业机会。美国中耳炎的临床治疗模式尚不清楚。
描述并量化美国儿童中耳炎治疗模式中的社会差异。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究纳入了Optum临床信息数据集市数据库2003年1月1日至2021年3月31日期间的索赔数据,以及4831408名患中耳炎儿童的住院、门诊和药品索赔数据。
首次诊断中耳炎时的年龄、性别、环境过敏、胃食管反流、腺样体扁桃体增生、邮政编码、社会剥夺指数得分、社会脆弱性指数得分。
儿童复发性和化脓性中耳炎的治疗、鼓膜置管以及未得到充分治疗的中耳炎严重并发症的治疗。社会劣势的主要衡量指标是社会剥夺指数。社会脆弱性指数用于敏感性分析以确保外部有效性。采用多因素逻辑回归分析来量化所有预测变量与研究结局之间的关联。
在4831408名美国中耳炎儿童中(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为4[1 - 8]岁;2491557名男孩[51.57%]),994921名(20.59%)接受了复发性中耳炎治疗,717978名(14.86%)接受了化脓性中耳炎治疗,335949名(6.95%)接受了鼓膜置管,10975名(0.23%)出现了中耳炎严重并发症。在纳入患者因素和社会指标的多变量回归模型中,诊断时年龄较小、男性、环境过敏、胃食管反流和腺样体扁桃体增生与中耳炎治疗增加相关,而社会剥夺指数与复发性中耳炎药物治疗几率较低(比值比[OR],0.86;95%置信区间,0.85 - 0.87)以及化脓性中耳炎(OR,0.61;95%置信区间,0.60 - 0.62)和鼓膜置管(OR,0.76;95%置信区间,0.75 - 0.78)相关,但出现严重并发症的几率较高(OR,1.28;95%置信区间,1.19 - 1.37)。
这项横断面研究的结果表明,社会处于劣势的中耳炎儿童接受治疗的可能性较小,且未得到充分治疗的中耳炎出现并发症的可能性更大。由于中耳炎是听力损失的一个可改变的危险因素,需要努力确保所有儿童都能公平获得治疗。