Suppr超能文献

预测酒精性肝病中终末期肝病模型的效用。

Predicting utility of a model for end stage liver disease in alcoholic liver disease.

作者信息

Soultati Aspasia S, Dourakis Spyridon P, Alexopoulou Alexandra, Deutsch Melanie, Vasilieva Larissa, Archimandritis Athanasios J

机构信息

2nd Department of Internal Medicine, University of Athens Medical School, Hippokration General Hospital, Greece.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul 7;12(25):4020-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4020.

Abstract

AIM

To validate the statistic utility of both the Maddrey Discriminant Function score and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease as predictors of short term (30 d and 90 d) mortality in patients with alcoholic hepatitis and to assess prognostic factors among clinical characteristics and laboratory variables of patients with alcoholic hepatitis.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with the diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis admitted to Hippokration University Hospital of Athens from 2000 to 2005 were assessed in the current retrospective study and a statistical analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

30- and 90-d mortality rates were reported at 5.9% (2/34) and 14.7% (5/34), respectively. Significant correlation was demonstrated for the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (P30 = 0.094, P90 = 0.046) and the Maddrey Discriminant Function score (P30 = 0.033, P90 = 0.038) with 30- and 90-d mortality whereas a significant association was also established for alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.057), fibrin degradation products (P = 0.048) and C-reactive protein (P = 0.067) with 90-d mortality. For 30-d mortality the Area Under the Curve was 0.969 (95%CI: 0.902-1.036, P = 0.028) for the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and 0.984 (95%CI: 0.942-1.027, P = 0.023) for the Maddrey Discriminant Function score with the optimal cut off point of 30.5 (sensitivity 1, specificity 0.937) and 108.68 (sensitivity 1, specificity 0.969), respectively. Accordingly, for 90-d mortality the Area Under the Curve was 0.762 (95%CI: 0.559-0.965, P = 0.065) for the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and 0.752 (95%CI: 0.465-1.038, P = 0.076) for the Maddrey Discriminant Function score with the optimal cut off point of 19 (sensitivity 0.6, specificity 0.6) and 92 (sensitivity 0.6, specificity 0.946), respectively. The observed Kaplan Meier survival rates for different score-categories were compared with log-rank tests and higher score values were correlated with a lower survival.

CONCLUSION

Equivalency of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and the Maddrey Discriminant Function score is implied by the current study, verified by the plotted Receiver Operative Curves and the estimated survival rates. A statistically significant utility of C-reactive protein, fibrin degradation products and alanine aminotransferase as independent predictors of 90-d mortality has also been verified.

摘要

目的

验证终末期肝病模型(Model for End-Stage Liver Disease,MELD)评分和Maddrey判别函数评分在酒精性肝炎患者短期(30天和90天)死亡率预测中的统计学效用,并评估酒精性肝炎患者临床特征和实验室指标中的预后因素。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,对2000年至2005年入住雅典希波克拉底大学医院且诊断为酒精性肝炎的34例患者进行评估,并进行统计分析。

结果

报告的30天和90天死亡率分别为5.9%(2/34)和14.7%(5/34)。终末期肝病模型(P30 = 0.094,P90 = 0.046)和Maddrey判别函数评分(P30 = 0.033,P90 = 0.038)与30天和90天死亡率显著相关,而丙氨酸氨基转移酶(P = 0.057)、纤维蛋白降解产物(P = 0.048)和C反应蛋白(P = 0.067)与90天死亡率也显著相关。对于30天死亡率,终末期肝病模型评分的曲线下面积为0.969(95%可信区间:0.902 - 1.036,P = 0.028),Maddrey判别函数评分的曲线下面积为0.984(95%可信区间:0.942 - 1.027,P = 0.023),最佳截断点分别为30.5(敏感性1,特异性0.937)和108.68(敏感性1,特异性0.969)。因此,对于90天死亡率,终末期肝病模型评分的曲线下面积为0.762(95%可信区间:0.559 - 0.965,P = 0.065),Maddrey判别函数评分的曲线下面积为0.752(95%可信区间:0.465 - 1.038,P = 0.076),最佳截断点分别为19(敏感性0.6,特异性0.6)和92(敏感性0.6,特异性0.946)。通过对数秩检验比较不同评分类别观察到的Kaplan-Meier生存率,较高的评分值与较低的生存率相关。

结论

本研究表明终末期肝病模型和Maddrey判别函数评分相当,通过绘制的受试者工作特征曲线和估计的生存率得到验证。C反应蛋白、纤维蛋白降解产物和丙氨酸氨基转移酶作为90天死亡率独立预测因子的统计学显著效用也得到了验证。

相似文献

8
[Clinical diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis in Tongliao City, Inner Mongolia].[内蒙古通辽市酒精性肝炎的临床诊断]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2021 Sep 20;29(9):861-866. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200423-00206.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in the management of alcohol-associated liver disease.酒精性肝病管理的进展
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2024 Nov 5;12:goae097. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goae097. eCollection 2024.
6
Week 2020 Poster Presentations.2020年第20周海报展示。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Oct;8(8_suppl):144-887. doi: 10.1177/2050640620927345.
7
UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations.2019年欧洲胃肠内镜学会周海报展示
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Oct;7(8_suppl):189-1030. doi: 10.1177/2050640619854671.

本文引用的文献

9
What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?验证一个预后模型是什么意思?
Stat Med. 2000 Feb 29;19(4):453-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::aid-sim350>3.0.co;2-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验