J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):55-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-55.
Pigeons were exposed to four different schedules of food reinforcement that arranged a fixed minimum time interval between reinforcements (60 sec or 300 sec). The first was a standard fixed-interval schedule. The second was a schedule in which food was presented automatically at the end of the fixed time interval as long as a response had occurred earlier. The third and fourth schedules were identical to the first two except that the first response after reinforcement changed the color on the key. When the schedule required a peck after the interval elapsed, the response pattern consisted of a pause after reinforcement followed by responding at a high rate until reinforcement. When a response was not required after the termination of the interval, the pattern consisted of a pause after reinforcement, followed by responses and then by a subsequent pause until reinforcement. Having the first response after reinforcement change the color on the key had little effect on performance. Post-reinforcement pause duration varied with the minimum interreinforcement interval but was unaffected by whether or not a response was required after the interval elapsed.
鸽子接受了四种不同的食物强化时间表,这些时间表安排了固定的最小时间间隔(60 秒或 300 秒)进行强化。第一个是标准的固定间隔时间表。第二个时间表是一种自动呈现食物的时间表,只要在固定时间间隔结束前发生了反应。第三个和第四个时间表与前两个完全相同,只是在强化后,第一个反应会改变钥匙上的颜色。当时间表要求在间隔结束后进行啄食时,反应模式包括在强化后暂停,然后以高速度进行反应,直到再次得到强化。当在间隔结束后不需要进行反应时,反应模式包括在强化后暂停,然后进行反应,接着是随后的暂停,直到再次得到强化。在强化后改变钥匙颜色的第一个反应对表现几乎没有影响。强化后暂停时间的长短取决于最小的强化间隔,但不受间隔结束后是否需要反应的影响。