J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jan;25(1):27-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-27.
Behavioral contrast reliably occurred in pigeons following errorless discrimination training, contrary to Terrace's (1963) observations. In the main experiment, a 60-sec green keylight, associated with a variable-interval 30-sec schedule of reinforcement alternated with a 60-sec period of extinction when the key was dark. Such aspects of the discrimination training procedure as: (1) the amount of prior nondifferential exposure to the positive stimulus before the discrimination was instituted, and (2) the rapidity with which the negative stimulus was introduced (whether progressively or abruptly) directly influenced the amount of behavioral contrast produced. This occurred independently of the number of errors made by a pigeon during acquisition of the discrimination. In a series of control experiments, substitution of a red keylight for the dark key during extinction resulted in greater behavioral contrast, while an increase to 3 min in the duration of the green keylight associated with reinforcement attenuated the behavioral contrast effect.
在无错误辨别训练后,鸽子的行为对比明显,与 Terrace(1963)的观察结果相反。在主要实验中,一盏时长 60 秒的绿色键光灯与一个可变间隔 30 秒的强化时间表交替出现,当键光灯熄灭时,会出现 60 秒的消退期。辨别训练程序的以下几个方面:(1)在建立辨别之前,对正刺激进行的无差别暴露的程度,以及(2)负刺激引入的速度(是逐步还是突然)直接影响产生的行为对比的程度。这与鸽子在辨别过程中所犯错误的数量无关。在一系列对照实验中,在消退期间用红色键光灯代替黑色键光灯会导致更大的行为对比,而将与强化相关的绿色键光灯的持续时间增加到 3 分钟会减弱行为对比的效果。