J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Mar;25(2):199-207. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-199.
Five pigeons were given single-stimulus training on an 8-sec differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule followed by steady-state generalization training using 12 wavelength stimuli. Three birds had a high percentage of reinforced responses on the training schedule and flat generalization gradients of total responses. The birds with fewer reinforced responses had much steeper generalization gradients. Generalization gradients plotted as a function of both stimulus wavelength and interresponse time showed that for most birds, stimulus control was restricted to responses with long interresponse times. Responses with very short interresponse times were not under stimulus control and there was some evidence of inhibitory control of short interresponse times. Interresponse-times-per-opportunity functions, plotted as a function of stimulus wavelength, showed that stimulus wavelength controlled the temporal distribution of responses, rather than the overall rate of response. The data indicate that the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule generates several response categories that are controlled in different ways by wavelength and time-correlated stimuli, and that averaging responses regardless of interresponse-time length obscures this control.
对五只鸽子进行了单刺激训练,使用 12 种波长的刺激进行了 8 秒的差异强化低率程序(differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule),随后进行了稳态泛化训练。三只鸽子在训练计划中有很高的强化反应百分比和总反应的平坦泛化梯度。强化反应较少的鸽子的泛化梯度陡峭得多。作为刺激波长和反应间时间的函数绘制的泛化梯度表明,对于大多数鸽子来说,刺激控制仅限于反应时间较长的反应。反应时间极短的反应不受刺激控制,并且有证据表明对短反应时间有抑制控制。作为刺激波长的函数绘制的每个机会的反应间时间函数(interresponse-times-per-opportunity functions)表明,刺激波长控制着反应的时间分布,而不是反应的总体速率。这些数据表明,差异强化低率程序产生了几个以不同方式被波长和时间相关刺激控制的反应类别,并且忽略反应间时间长度而平均化反应掩盖了这种控制。