Suppr超能文献

刺激控制的差异强化率反应。

Stimulus control of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate responding.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Mar;25(2):199-207. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-199.

Abstract

Five pigeons were given single-stimulus training on an 8-sec differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule followed by steady-state generalization training using 12 wavelength stimuli. Three birds had a high percentage of reinforced responses on the training schedule and flat generalization gradients of total responses. The birds with fewer reinforced responses had much steeper generalization gradients. Generalization gradients plotted as a function of both stimulus wavelength and interresponse time showed that for most birds, stimulus control was restricted to responses with long interresponse times. Responses with very short interresponse times were not under stimulus control and there was some evidence of inhibitory control of short interresponse times. Interresponse-times-per-opportunity functions, plotted as a function of stimulus wavelength, showed that stimulus wavelength controlled the temporal distribution of responses, rather than the overall rate of response. The data indicate that the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule generates several response categories that are controlled in different ways by wavelength and time-correlated stimuli, and that averaging responses regardless of interresponse-time length obscures this control.

摘要

对五只鸽子进行了单刺激训练,使用 12 种波长的刺激进行了 8 秒的差异强化低率程序(differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule),随后进行了稳态泛化训练。三只鸽子在训练计划中有很高的强化反应百分比和总反应的平坦泛化梯度。强化反应较少的鸽子的泛化梯度陡峭得多。作为刺激波长和反应间时间的函数绘制的泛化梯度表明,对于大多数鸽子来说,刺激控制仅限于反应时间较长的反应。反应时间极短的反应不受刺激控制,并且有证据表明对短反应时间有抑制控制。作为刺激波长的函数绘制的每个机会的反应间时间函数(interresponse-times-per-opportunity functions)表明,刺激波长控制着反应的时间分布,而不是反应的总体速率。这些数据表明,差异强化低率程序产生了几个以不同方式被波长和时间相关刺激控制的反应类别,并且忽略反应间时间长度而平均化反应掩盖了这种控制。

相似文献

1
Stimulus control of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate responding.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Mar;25(2):199-207. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-199.
2
Signalled reinforcement in differential-reinforcement-of-low rate schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):381-90. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-381.
3
The role of reinforcement in controlling sequential IRT dependencies.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Sep;14(2):145-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-145.
4
Effects of d-amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide on spaced responding in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Sep;14(2):177-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-177.
5
Repeated measurements of reinforcement effects on gradients of stimulus control.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):451-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-451.
6
Reinforcement contingencies maintaining collateral responding under a DRL schedule.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):413-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-413.
7
STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7(5):369-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-369.
8
Peak shift as a function of multiple schedules of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Nov;22(3):463-70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-463.
9
The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):581-91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-581.
10
Synthetic variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):311-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-311.

引用本文的文献

1
Operant generalization in quail neonates after intradimensional training: Distinguishing positive and negative reinforcement.
Behav Processes. 2010 Jan;83(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
2
Inhibition: A cautionary tale.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):333-41. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-333.
4
Memory for recent behavior in the pigeon.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jul;38(1):71-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-71.
5
The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):405-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-405.
6
Discriminated interresponse times: role of autoshaped responses.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Nov;44(3):301-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-301.
8
The allocation of time to temporally defined behaviors: responding during stimulus generalization.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):191-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-191.

本文引用的文献

2
Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3 Pt 2 Suppl):373-409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-s373.
3
Collateral responding during differential reinforcement of low rates.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):971-6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-971.
4
Repeated measurements of reinforcement effects on gradients of stimulus control.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):451-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-451.
5
Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):81-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-81.
6
STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7(5):369-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-369.
7
EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7(4):303-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-303.
8
PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT.
Science. 1963 Oct 18;142(3590):412-3. doi: 10.1126/science.142.3590.412.
10
Further observations on overt "mediating" behavior and the discrimination of time.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):43-57. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-43.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验