J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 May;25(3):303-10. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-303.
Rats learned to reacquire four similar three-member response sequences. Each sequence member was associated with a different response lever, and the correct sequence of levers (i.e., 3-1-2, 2-1-3, 1-3-2, and 2-3-1) changed each session. The first two correct responses of each sequence postponed shock for a fixed period of time. The third correct response initiated a signalled timeout from avoidance. Incorrect responses did not affect the shock interval or reset the sequence. The effects of manipulating timeout duration on the sequential reacquisition baseline were investigated. All subjects displayed biphasic reacquisition performances similar to those controlled by food. The phases were characterized by an initial increase in accuracy, which reached a stable level during the latter portion of each session. Timeout duration affected rate of sequence completion and shock density, but not percentage of errors. Rate of sequence completion was fastest with intermediate timeouts (15 to 60 sec), and slowest with extreme durations (1 or 120 sec). Shock densities peaked with extreme durations and were at minimum with intermediate timeout values. The percentage of errors was the same across timeout durations. These data extend the generality of sequential reacquisition as a procedure for studying learning, and demonstrate timeout from avoidance to be a controlling variable.
大鼠学会重新获取四个相似的三成员反应序列。每个序列成员与不同的反应杆相关联,并且正确的杆序列(即 3-1-2、2-1-3、1-3-2 和 2-3-1)每个会话都会更改。每个序列的前两个正确响应会将冲击推迟固定时间。第三个正确响应会启动避免信号超时。错误响应不会影响冲击间隔或重置序列。研究了操纵超时持续时间对序列重新获取基线的影响。所有受试者都表现出与食物控制相似的双相重新获取性能。这些阶段的特点是准确性最初增加,在每个会话的后半部分达到稳定水平。超时持续时间会影响序列完成率和冲击密度,但不会影响错误百分比。在中等超时(15 到 60 秒)时,序列完成率最快,在极端超时(1 或 120 秒)时最慢。冲击密度在极端超时达到峰值,在中等超时达到最小值。错误百分比在不同的超时持续时间内是相同的。这些数据扩展了作为研究学习的程序的序列重新获取的通用性,并证明了避免超时是一个控制变量。