J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):495-509. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-495.
Traditionally, aversive control has been viewed as a separate domain within behavior theory. Sometimes this separateness has been based upon a distinction between reinforcement and punishment, and sometimes upon a distinction between positive and negative reinforcement. The latter is regarded here as the more compelling basis, due to some inherent procedural asymmetries. An approach to the interpretation of negative reinforcement is presented, with indication of types of experiments that support it and that also point to promising directions for further work. However, most of the interpretive issues that arise here are relevant to positively reinforced behavior as well. These include: possible reformulation of the operant/respondent distinction; the place of emotional concepts in behavior analysis; the need for simultaneous, complementary analysis on differing time scales; the understanding of behavioral situations with rewarding or aversive properties that depend as much upon the contingencies that the situations involve as upon the primary rewarding or aversive stimuli that they include. Thus, an adequate understanding of this domain, which has been traditionally viewed as distinct, has implications for all domains of behavior-analytic theory.
传统上,厌恶控制被视为行为理论中的一个独立领域。有时这种独立性是基于强化和惩罚之间的区别,有时是基于正强化和负强化之间的区别。由于某些内在的程序不对称性,后者被认为是更有说服力的基础。本文提出了一种解释负强化的方法,并指出了支持它的实验类型,这些实验也为进一步的工作指出了有前途的方向。然而,这里出现的大多数解释问题与正强化行为也有关。这些问题包括:操作性/反应性区别的可能重新表述;情绪概念在行为分析中的地位;在不同时间尺度上同时进行互补分析的必要性;对具有奖励或惩罚属性的行为情境的理解,这些情境不仅取决于它们所包含的主要奖励或惩罚刺激,还取决于它们所涉及的情境的偶然性。因此,对这个传统上被视为独特的领域的充分理解,对行为分析理论的所有领域都有影响。