Suppr超能文献

参与大鼠下丘脑外侧对声音线索的条件性神经反应的中枢位点。

Central sites involved in lateral hypothalamus conditioned neural responses to acoustic cues in the rat.

作者信息

Nakamura K, Ono T, Tamura R

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharamceutical University, Japan.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1987 Nov;58(5):1123-48. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.5.1123.

Abstract
  1. Unit activity in the lateral hypothalamus (LHA) of the rat was recorded during discrimination learning of cue-tone stimuli (CTS) predicting glucose (CTS1+) or intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) (CTS2+) as positive reinforcement or electric shock (CTS1-) or tail pinch (CTS2-) as negative reinforcement. The same action, licking, was used as the behavioral response to all stimuli. Procaine hydrochloride, a local anesthetic, was microinjected into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the amygdala (AM). LHA neuron responses and licking were analyzed to investigate the afferent input pathway(s) responsible for LHA neural responses to conditioning CTSs in positive reinforcement and to identify the central site involved in CTS learning. Although the animals were restrained, there was no respiratory, cardiac rate, or blood pressure evidence of stress. The headholder was specially designed in our laboratory to avoid pain or discomfort to the animal. The subjects would often, after the first few sessions, voluntarily enter into position in the apparatus, presumably to obtain the reward available during the experiments. 2. In positive reinforcement, a rat was rewarded by 5 microliters of glucose or ICSS when it licked a spout. The rat licked for glucose after CTS1+ or for ICSS after CTS2+. In negative reinforcement, an aversive stimulus, either electric shock or tail pinch, was applied if the rat did not lick the spout. The electric shock and tail pinch were maintained weak enough to produce an avoidance ratio less than 20-30%, averaged in all trials. The rat licked to avoid electric shock after CTS1- or tail pinch after CTS2-. 3. Of 271 LHA neurons analyzed, 202 (74.5%) responded to either or both rewarding and aversive stimuli. The number of neurons that responded to only rewarding stimuli was relatively large (105/271), and the number that responded similarly to both rewarding and aversive stimuli was small (29/271). The effects of both glucose and ICSS, and the effects of both electric shock and tail pinch, were usually similar in neurons analyzed for both rewarding and aversive stimulation. Of 271 neurons, 173 responded differentially to rewarding and aversive stimuli. 4. Neural and behavioral responses were recorded before, during, and after local anesthesia of the VTA in 15 rats and of the AM in 14 rats. Injections of 0.3-0.8 microliters of 5% procaine hydrochloride or 0.9% saline were made at a rate of 0.3 microliters/min through guide cannulae chronically implanted in the VTA and AM, ipsilateral to the recording and ICSS sites in 29 rats that self-stimulated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 在大鼠辨别学习提示音刺激(CTS)期间,记录其外侧下丘脑(LHA)的单位活动。这些提示音刺激预测葡萄糖(CTS1 +)或颅内自我刺激(ICSS)(CTS2 +)作为正强化,或电击(CTS1 -)或夹尾(CTS2 -)作为负强化。对所有刺激的行为反应均为舔舐这一相同动作。将局部麻醉剂盐酸普鲁卡因微量注射到腹侧被盖区(VTA)和杏仁核(AM)。分析LHA神经元反应和舔舐行为,以研究负责LHA神经元对正强化中条件性CTS作出反应的传入输入通路,并确定参与CTS学习的中枢位点。尽管动物受到约束,但没有应激导致的呼吸、心率或血压方面的证据。固定动物头部的装置是我们实验室专门设计的,以避免给动物带来疼痛或不适。在最初几次实验后,实验对象通常会自愿进入实验装置的位置,大概是为了获取实验期间可得的奖励。2. 在正强化中,大鼠舔舐喷嘴时会得到5微升葡萄糖或ICSS奖励。大鼠在CTS1 +后舔舐获取葡萄糖,或在CTS2 +后舔舐获取ICSS。在负强化中,如果大鼠不舔舐喷嘴,就会施加厌恶刺激,即电击或夹尾。电击和夹尾的强度保持在足够弱的程度,以使所有实验的平均回避率低于20 - 30%。大鼠在CTS1 -后舔舐以避免电击,或在CTS2 -后舔舐以避免夹尾。3. 在分析的271个LHA神经元中,202个(74.5%)对奖励性和厌恶性刺激中的一种或两种都有反应。仅对奖励性刺激有反应的神经元数量相对较多(105/271),对奖励性和厌恶性刺激反应相似的神经元数量较少(29/271)。在分析奖励性和厌恶性刺激的神经元中,葡萄糖和ICSS的作用,以及电击和夹尾的作用通常相似。在271个神经元中,173个对奖励性和厌恶性刺激有不同反应。4. 在15只大鼠的VTA和14只大鼠的AM进行局部麻醉之前、期间和之后,记录神经和行为反应。通过长期植入VTA和AM的引导套管,以0.3微升/分钟的速度注射0.3 - 0.8微升5%盐酸普鲁卡因或0.9%生理盐水,这些大鼠共29只,均进行自我刺激,记录和ICSS位点位于注射部位的同侧。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验