J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):365-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-365.
Finding a theoretically sound feedback function for variable-interval schedules remains an important unsolved problem. It is important because interval schedules model a significant feature of the world: the dependence of reinforcement on factors beyond the organism's control. The problem remains unsolved because no feedback function yet proposed satisfies all the theoretical and empirical requirements. Previous suggestions that succeed in fitting data fail theoretically because they violate a newly recognized theoretical requirement: The slope of the function must approach or equal 1.0 at the origin. A function is presented that satisfies all requirements but lacks any theoretical justification. This function and two suggested by Prelec and Herrnstein (1978) and Nevin and Baum (1980) are evaluated against several sets of data. All three fitted the data well. The success of the two theoretically incorrect functions raises an empirical puzzle: Low rates of reinforcement are coupled with response rates that seem anomalously high. It remains to be discovered what this reflects about the temporal patterning of operant behavior at low reinforcement rates. A theoretically and empirically correct function derived from basic assumptions about operant behavior also remains to be discovered.
为变时距程序找到一个理论上合理的反馈函数仍然是一个重要的未解决的问题。这很重要,因为间隔程序模型是世界的一个重要特征:强化取决于超出生物体控制的因素。这个问题仍然没有解决,因为迄今为止提出的没有一个反馈函数能够满足所有的理论和经验要求。以前那些成功拟合数据的建议在理论上是失败的,因为它们违反了一个新认识到的理论要求:该函数在原点处的斜率必须接近或等于 1.0。本文提出了一个满足所有要求但缺乏任何理论依据的函数。该函数和 Prelec 和 Herrnstein(1978)以及 Nevin 和 Baum(1980)提出的两个函数,都根据几组数据进行了评估。这三个函数都很好地拟合了数据。两个理论上不正确的函数的成功提出了一个经验上的难题:低强化率与反应率似乎异常高相关联。尚待发现这反映了低强化率下操作性行为的时间模式是什么。一个从操作性行为的基本假设中得出的理论上和经验上正确的函数也有待发现。